Hospital Universitario Araba sede Txagorritxu, year by year
Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about Hospital Universitario Araba sede Txagorritxu between 2009 and 2023: 15 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2020
1
2021
111
2022
157
2023
234
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2021
—
16 – 46.8%
2022
—
9.6 – 31.1%
2023
0 – 100%
33.8 – 54.2%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2021
0 – 24%
17.3 – 40.4%
2022
5.2 – 40.2%
9.6 – 26.8%
2023
0 – 44.8%
15 – 29.2%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Frozen embryos
2022
0 – 67.4%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
8.5 – 18.5%
2010
7.9 – 16.4%
2011
6.2 – 15.4%
2012
7.8 – 15.3%
2013
13.2 – 20.5%
2014
11 – 17.3%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
15.6 – 26.4%
2016
5.9 – 13.3%
2017
7.7 – 18%
2018
10.5 – 20.8%
2019
9.5 – 21.8%
2020
14.2 – 32.7%
2021
13.4 – 28.3%
2022
6 – 16.9%
2023
8.6 – 24.4%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
13.7 – 22.8%
2016
11.2 – 19.4%
2017
7.6 – 17.1%
2018
8.3 – 17.7%
2019
9.7 – 19.5%
2020
7.4 – 19.2%
2021
6.6 – 17.7%
2022
9.8 – 23%
2023
4.8 – 16.8%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
8.2 – 38.5%
2010
0.8 – 21.4%
2011
4.3 – 28.1%
2012
12.4 – 36.5%
2013
10.8 – 27.8%
2014
13 – 29.6%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
9.9 – 36.3%
2016
6.5 – 46.1%
2017
7.7 – 29.8%
2018
12.5 – 38.6%
2019
12.1 – 42.5%
2020
0 – 32.2%
2021
9.9 – 36.3%
2022
3.5 – 23.8%
2023
10.6 – 30.6%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
7.2 – 28.1%
2016
9.5 – 25.8%
2017
8 – 28.4%
2018
10 – 27.8%
2019
4.9 – 22.7%
2020
4.8 – 22.3%
2021
9.1 – 24.6%
2022
7.9 – 24.9%
2023
12.8 – 33.3%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2009
H. De Txagorritxu
No data
No data
No data
8.5 – 18.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF
2010
H. De Txagorritxu
No data
No data
No data
7.9 – 16.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2010-Registro SEF
2011
H. De Txagorritxu
No data
No data
No data
6.2 – 15.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF
2012
H. De Txagorritxu
No data
No data
No data
7.8 – 15.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013
H. De Txagorritxu
No data
No data
No data
13.2 – 20.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF
2014
Hospital Universitario Araba sede Txagorritxu
No data
No data
No data
11 – 17.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
Hospital Universitario Araba sede Txagorritxu
No data
No data
No data
15.6 – 26.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
Hospital Universitario Araba sede Txagorritxu
No data
No data
No data
5.9 – 13.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
Hospital Universitario Araba sede Txagorritxu
No data
No data
No data
7.7 – 18%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
Hospital Universitario Araba sede Txagorritxu
No data
No data
No data
10.5 – 20.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
Hospital Universitario Araba sede Txagorritxu
No data
No data
No data
9.5 – 21.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
Hospital Universitario Araba sede Txagorritxu
No data
1
No data
14.2 – 32.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
Hospital Universitario Araba sede Txagorritxu
100-500
111
No data
13.4 – 28.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
Hospital Universitario Araba sede Txagorritxu
100-500
157
No data
6 – 16.9%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
Hospital Universitario Araba sede Txagorritxu
100-500
234
0 – 100%
8.6 – 24.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.