Institut de Ginecologia i Reproduccio de Barcelona, year by year
Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about Institut de Ginecologia i Reproduccio de Barcelona between 2009 and 2013: 4 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
See this chart’s data
| Year | Under 40 |
|---|---|
| 2009 | 2.4 – 17.6% |
| 2010 | 0 – 17.8% |
| 2011 | 0 – 20.7% |
| 2013 | 7.1 – 48.5% |
See this chart’s data
| Year | Under 40 |
|---|---|
| 2009 | 17.1 – 100% |
| 2010 | 0 – 55% |
| 2011 | 0 – 44.8% |
| 2013 | 10.4 – 45.6% |
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
| Year | Name in the registry | Pregnancy per cycle (insemination) | Attribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Institut de Ginecologia i Reproduccio de Barcelona | 2.4 – 17.6% | Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF |
| 2010 | Institut de Ginecologia i Reproduccio de Barcelona | 0 – 17.8% | Registro Nacional de Actividad 2010-Registro SEF |
| 2011 | Institut de Ginecologia i Reproduccio de Barcelona | 0 – 20.7% | Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF |
| 2012 | No data | ||
| 2013 | Institut de Ginecologia i Reproduccio de Barcelona | 7.1 – 48.5% | Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF |
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.
Official guide: how to interpret a centre’s data (PDF, in Spanish)
← Back to the Institut de Ginecologia i Reproduccio de Barcelona profile
Source: “Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF” (Spanish National ART Activity Registry) — registrosef.com, retrieved 31 July 2026.