Hospital La Salud, UR Cádiz, grupo HLA, year by year
Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about Hospital La Salud, UR Cádiz, grupo HLA between 2013 and 2023: 11 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2013
96
2014
107
2015
118
2016
145
2017
110
2018
68
2019
65
2020
45
2021
53
2022
53
2023
39
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2013
13
2014
35
2015
32
2016
33
2017
20
2018
25
2019
39
2020
13
2021
20
2022
16
2023
7
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2013
20.7 – 54.3%
24.9 – 54.1%
2014
24.6 – 66.3%
50.5 – 99.5%
2015
16.3 – 56.5%
15.2 – 64.8%
2016
14.5 – 43.4%
15.8 – 48.7%
2017
19.4 – 68.1%
20.4 – 61.5%
2018
0 – 86.7%
23.8 – 76.2%
2019
0 – 82.9%
33.2 – 76.8%
2020
0 – 55%
21.7 – 78.3%
2021
1 – 99%
6.7 – 60%
2022
100 – 100%
54 – 99.8%
2023
17.1 – 100%
25.1 – 84%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2013
6.5 – 32.4%
9 – 30.1%
2014
17 – 44.9%
0 – 22.2%
2015
6.1 – 30.7%
7.1 – 48.5%
2016
1.6 – 30.4%
9 – 41%
2017
14.2 – 47.9%
11.6 – 49.2%
2018
25.5 – 74.5%
23.8 – 76.2%
2019
26.7 – 80.9%
19 – 81%
2021
7.9 – 64.8%
23.3 – 70.8%
2022
0 – 67.4%
7.7 – 42.3%
2023
100 – 100%
41.6 – 98.4%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2013
6.2 – 79.5%
1.6 – 58.4%
2014
1 – 53.6%
0 – 55.1%
2015
0 – 33.9%
0 – 40.2%
2016
0 – 13.9%
—
2017
0 – 22.2%
0 – 71.1%
2018
0 – 30.5%
0 – 46.5%
2019
7.9 – 64.8%
0 – 46.5%
2020
—
0 – 62%
2021
0 – 55.1%
—
2022
—
0 – 67.4%
2023
—
0 – 28.6%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2013
0 – 100%
100 – 100%
2014
0 – 46.5%
—
2018
13.3 – 100%
100 – 100%
2019
100 – 100%
—
2020
100 – 100%
—
2022
100 – 100%
0 – 100%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2013
0 – 82.9%
0 – 82.9%
2014
41.6 – 98.4%
10 – 90%
2015
1.6 – 58.4%
0 – 62%
2016
—
0 – 62%
2017
—
100 – 100%
2018
0 – 67.4%
—
2019
0 – 86.7%
—
2020
0 – 100%
—
2021
0 – 86.7%
10 – 90%
2022
—
0 – 100%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2013
32.6 – 100%
32.6 – 100%
2014
38 – 100%
—
2015
0 – 86.7%
0 – 44.8%
2016
4 – 71%
8.5 – 54%
2017
2.5 – 64.1%
53.5 – 100%
2018
0 – 71.1%
23.1 – 88%
2019
50.6 – 100%
26.9 – 73.1%
2020
0 – 100%
—
2021
17.1 – 100%
10 – 90%
2022
100 – 100%
50.6 – 100%
2023
—
0 – 71.1%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2013
0 – 71.1%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2018
100 – 100%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2013
6.2 – 79.5%
2014
0 – 55%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
0 – 86.7%
2016
1 – 99%
2023
100 – 100%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 86.7%
2016
0 – 55%
2017
100 – 100%
2021
0 – 67.4%
2022
100 – 100%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2013
Clínica La Salud
100-500
109
20.7 – 54.3%
0 – 71.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF
2014
Clínica La Salud
100-500
142
24.6 – 66.3%
0 – 55%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
Clínica La Salud
100-500
150
16.3 – 56.5%
0 – 86.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
Clínica La Salud
100-500
178
14.5 – 43.4%
1 – 99%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
Clínica La Salud
No data
130
19.4 – 68.1%
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
Clínica La Salud
No data
93
0 – 86.7%
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
Clínica La Salud
No data
104
0 – 82.9%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
Hospital La Salud, UR Cádiz, grupo HLA
No data
58
0 – 55%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
Hospital La Salud, UR Cádiz, grupo HLA
No data
73
1 – 99%
0 – 67.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
Hospital La Salud, UR Cádiz, grupo HLA
No data
69
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
Hospital La Salud, UR Cádiz, grupo HLA
No data
46
17.1 – 100%
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.