URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla, year by year
Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla between 2009 and 2023: 15 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2009
182
2010
257
2011
265
2012
276
2013
265
2014
274
2015
261
2016
164
2017
325
2018
482
2019
381
2020
294
2021
293
2022
355
2023
334
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
11.7 – 28.3%
13 – 29.9%
2010
24.5 – 41.1%
24.5 – 41.1%
2011
17.5 – 32.2%
17.5 – 32.2%
2012
38.8 – 57.5%
37.8 – 55.9%
2013
31.8 – 51.5%
28.8 – 47.4%
2014
20.2 – 40.5%
—
2015
20 – 39.5%
1 – 99%
2016
16.3 – 45.3%
7.8 – 51.1%
2017
22.7 – 44%
21.5 – 67.4%
2018
20.8 – 38.2%
24 – 48.1%
2019
22.5 – 42.6%
15.5 – 37.9%
2020
7 – 34.2%
20.9 – 42.9%
2021
0 – 20.2%
28.5 – 51%
2022
10.4 – 45.6%
18.9 – 35.8%
2023
0 – 42.9%
29.3 – 51.2%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
21.9 – 39.2%
21.9 – 39.2%
2010
16.1 – 30.2%
16.1 – 30.2%
2011
15.3 – 28.4%
15.4 – 28.6%
2012
21.2 – 36.5%
20.6 – 35.5%
2013
23.6 – 38.3%
21.5 – 35.2%
2014
23.1 – 36.9%
—
2015
21.3 – 35.5%
0 – 35.4%
2016
28.5 – 51.5%
1.8 – 31.6%
2017
18.2 – 32.5%
14.5 – 43.4%
2018
19 – 32.9%
19.2 – 41.4%
2019
19 – 36.5%
14 – 31.5%
2020
15.2 – 37.3%
11.3 – 26.1%
2021
11.1 – 33.3%
18.9 – 38.2%
2022
13.9 – 37%
22.9 – 40.2%
2023
19.9 – 43.4%
17.7 – 32.3%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2010
0.5 – 49.5%
0.5 – 49.5%
2011
6.7 – 60%
6.7 – 60%
2012
12.6 – 58%
11.6 – 55.1%
2013
0 – 40.2%
0 – 33.9%
2014
0 – 33.9%
—
2015
0 – 44.8%
—
2016
0.2 – 46%
—
2017
7.2 – 30.9%
1.6 – 58.4%
2018
14.1 – 35.1%
15.8 – 48.7%
2019
3.9 – 33.2%
5.2 – 40.2%
2020
—
8.5 – 54%
2021
0 – 17.1%
2.1 – 21.7%
2022
4.6 – 37.1%
4.8 – 30.5%
2023
11 – 47.4%
11.6 – 49.2%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2010
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2010
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2010
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
2.3 – 6.8%
2010
4.1 – 8.6%
2011
4 – 8.9%
2012
4.4 – 10%
2013
8.1 – 15.8%
2014
7.7 – 14.8%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
4.4 – 12.6%
2016
4.1 – 13%
2017
3.1 – 12.1%
2018
4.6 – 12.3%
2019
6.9 – 16.9%
2020
2.7 – 13.2%
2021
5.2 – 15.4%
2022
5.8 – 17%
2023
4.6 – 15.1%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
2.5 – 10.1%
2016
2 – 9%
2017
3.9 – 13.2%
2018
5.1 – 13.6%
2019
3.3 – 13.1%
2020
4.7 – 19.6%
2021
1.2 – 9.9%
2022
0.4 – 14.4%
2023
6.7 – 20.4%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
1.8 – 14%
2010
1.9 – 14.7%
2011
5 – 19.1%
2012
1.5 – 11.6%
2013
6.7 – 20.4%
2014
2.5 – 17.9%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
20 – 52.8%
2016
8.2 – 38.5%
2017
5.8 – 26.2%
2018
1.4 – 15.6%
2019
7.8 – 33.2%
2020
1.5 – 29.3%
2021
12.9 – 39.5%
2022
6.5 – 37.9%
2023
14.1 – 44.7%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
3.2 – 29.1%
2016
3.9 – 18.4%
2017
10.7 – 32.2%
2018
0.9 – 22.6%
2019
9.8 – 31.7%
2020
0 – 9.2%
2021
2.3 – 22.7%
2022
1.9 – 14.7%
2023
2.9 – 20.6%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2009
Hospital Marques de Valdecilla
100-500
182
11.7 – 28.3%
2.3 – 6.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF
2010
Residencia De Cantabria. Hospital Marques de Valdecilla
100-500
257
24.5 – 41.1%
4.1 – 8.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2010-Registro SEF
2011
URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla
100-500
265
17.5 – 32.2%
4 – 8.9%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF
2012
URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla
100-500
276
38.8 – 57.5%
4.4 – 10%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013
URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla
100-500
265
31.8 – 51.5%
8.1 – 15.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF
2014
URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla
100-500
274
20.2 – 40.5%
7.7 – 14.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla
100-500
261
20 – 39.5%
4.4 – 12.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla
100-500
164
16.3 – 45.3%
4.1 – 13%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla
100-500
325
22.7 – 44%
3.1 – 12.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla
> 500 · 100-500
482
20.8 – 38.2%
4.6 – 12.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla
100-500
381
22.5 – 42.6%
6.9 – 16.9%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla
100-500
294
7 – 34.2%
2.7 – 13.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla
100-500
293
0 – 20.2%
5.2 – 15.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla
100-500
355
10.4 – 45.6%
5.8 – 17%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
URA Valdecilla. Hospital U .Marques de Valdecilla
100-500
334
0 – 42.9%
4.6 – 15.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.