Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about HOSPITAL REY DON JAIME between 2014 and 2023: 10 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2014
127
2015
91
2016
126
2017
111
2018
59
2019
54
2020
70
2021
96
2022
72
2023
66
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2014
45
2015
35
2016
34
2017
36
2018
25
2019
23
2020
19
2021
24
2022
23
2023
25
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
45.2 – 77%
28.1 – 78.6%
2015
31.8 – 72.6%
26.7 – 80.9%
2016
7.7 – 42.3%
0 – 30.5%
2017
5.6 – 42%
5.2 – 40.2%
2018
31.2 – 83.1%
0 – 46.5%
2019
0 – 40.2%
4 – 71%
2020
10.6 – 60.8%
25.1 – 84%
2021
12.6 – 58%
10.6 – 60.8%
2022
28.1 – 78.6%
0 – 17.1%
2023
15.4 – 84.6%
2.5 – 64.1%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
20 – 52.8%
8.1 – 44%
2015
14.5 – 52.2%
15.2 – 64.8%
2016
14.2 – 47.9%
3.7 – 32%
2017
1.6 – 30.4%
0 – 14.6%
2018
7.9 – 64.8%
0 – 30.5%
2019
8.5 – 54%
0 – 71.1%
2020
14.1 – 55.9%
0 – 28.7%
2021
11.6 – 49.2%
4.3 – 35.7%
2022
1 – 53.6%
1.6 – 58.4%
2023
10.6 – 60.8%
0 – 27.1%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
9.5 – 57.2%
0 – 82.9%
2015
0 – 35%
—
2016
0 – 17.1%
0.2 – 46%
2017
0 – 37.9%
—
2018
0 – 55%
17.1 – 100%
2019
0 – 37.8%
—
2021
—
0 – 35.4%
2022
0 – 28.6%
—
2023
0 – 44.8%
0 – 35.4%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
0 – 86.7%
0 – 100%
2015
0 – 100%
100 – 100%
2016
0 – 100%
0 – 86.7%
2017
0 – 100%
100 – 100%
2020
—
0 – 100%
2021
100 – 100%
—
2022
—
0 – 100%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
10 – 90%
—
2015
38 – 100%
0 – 71.1%
2016
41.6 – 98.4%
—
2017
0 – 86.7%
—
2018
17.1 – 100%
—
2019
100 – 100%
13.3 – 100%
2021
0 – 100%
—
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
35.7 – 80.1%
7.9 – 64.8%
2015
30.4 – 86.2%
20.5 – 93.8%
2016
21.7 – 78.3%
0 – 82.9%
2017
15.2 – 64.8%
0 – 41%
2018
29.6 – 90.4%
0 – 40.2%
2019
55.2 – 100%
0 – 55%
2020
1 – 99%
12 – 64.9%
2021
12 – 64.9%
28.9 – 100%
2022
0 – 55.1%
0 – 44.8%
2023
2.5 – 64.1%
4.9 – 52.2%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2017
1 – 99%
2021
13.3 – 100%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2019
13.3 – 100%
2021
0 – 86.7%
2022
0 – 100%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2019
100 – 100%
2020
100 – 100%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2014
HOSPITAL REY DON JAIME
100-500
172
45.2 – 77%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
HOSPITAL REY DON JAIME
No data
126
31.8 – 72.6%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
HOSPITAL REY DON JAIME
No data
160
7.7 – 42.3%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
HOSPITAL REY DON JAIME
No data
147
5.6 – 42%
1 – 99%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
HOSPITAL REY DON JAIME
No data
84
31.2 – 83.1%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
HOSPITAL REY DON JAIME
No data
77
0 – 40.2%
13.3 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
HOSPITAL REY DON JAIME
No data
89
10.6 – 60.8%
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
HOSPITAL REY DON JAIME
No data
120
12.6 – 58%
13.3 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
HOSPITAL REY DON JAIME
No data
95
28.1 – 78.6%
0 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
HOSPITAL REY DON JAIME
No data
91
15.4 – 84.6%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.