Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about Clinica Mesa Dominguez CLINICA MD between 2014 and 2018: 5 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2014
20
2015
17
2016
8
2017
12
2018
4
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2014
2
2015
6
2016
6
2017
2
2018
1
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
2014
9.6 – 70.4%
2015
0 – 62%
2017
32.6 – 100%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
0 – 55%
—
2015
0 – 55%
—
2017
0 – 100%
0 – 100%
2018
100 – 100%
—
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Frozen embryos
2017
100 – 100%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
2016
100 – 100%
Egg donation · Over 40See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
2014
0 – 100%
2015
0 – 86.7%
2016
0 – 100%
2018
100 – 100%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2014
0 – 18.1%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2018
0 – 55.1%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2014
9.6 – 70.4%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2017
0 – 55.1%
2018
0 – 86.7%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 46.5%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2014
Clinica Mesa Dominguez
22
9.6 – 70.4%
0 – 18.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
Clinica Mesa Dominguez CLINICA MD
23
0 – 62%
0 – 46.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
Clinica Mesa Dominguez CLINICA MD
14
No data
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
Clinica Mesa Dominguez CLINICA MD
14
32.6 – 100%
0 – 55.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
Clinica Mesa Dominguez CLINICA MD
5
No data
0 – 55.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.
