Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about IFEM CORDOBA S.L.P between 2015 and 2023: 9 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2015
20
2016
57
2017
58
2018
59
2019
78
2020
123
2021
194
2022
210
2023
176
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2020
29
2021
73
2022
87
2023
78
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2015
44.9 – 100%
0 – 86.7%
2016
6.7 – 60%
—
2017
0 – 40.2%
0 – 22.2%
2018
12 – 64.9%
0 – 49.4%
2019
0.5 – 49.5%
10 – 90%
2020
21.4 – 71.9%
16.3 – 52.9%
2021
35.4 – 82.2%
39.2 – 60.8%
2022
23.3 – 70.8%
39.4 – 60.6%
2023
21.4 – 71.9%
32.1 – 55.2%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2015
20.5 – 93.8%
—
2016
1.6 – 30.4%
2.5 – 64.1%
2017
0 – 19.3%
4 – 71%
2018
4.9 – 52.2%
0.2 – 46%
2019
3.5 – 31%
13.8 – 69.6%
2020
16 – 46.8%
10 – 40%
2021
5.6 – 42%
40.3 – 67.4%
2022
30.2 – 75.1%
30.9 – 54.4%
2023
30.2 – 75.1%
22.3 – 46.7%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2015
0 – 55.1%
—
2016
0 – 35.4%
—
2017
0 – 49.4%
—
2018
—
6.2 – 79.5%
2019
6.7 – 60%
6.2 – 79.5%
2020
6.2 – 79.5%
0 – 35.4%
2021
19 – 81%
13.8 – 69.6%
2022
—
3 – 41.4%
2023
0 – 86.7%
1.6 – 58.4%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2020
0 – 100%
—
2021
—
28.9 – 100%
2022
—
15.4 – 84.6%
2023
—
100 – 100%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2020
—
1 – 99%
2021
0 – 55%
16.9 – 68.8%
2022
—
34.2 – 74.1%
2023
—
28.1 – 78.6%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2020
16 – 74.9%
15.4 – 84.6%
2021
35.2 – 84.8%
30.1 – 66.5%
2022
—
27.6 – 53.8%
2023
—
33.4 – 58.4%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2017
0 – 86.7%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2019
0 – 49.4%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2016
1 – 99%
2017
100 – 100%
2019
0 – 86.7%
2021
100 – 100%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 100%
2016
0 – 62%
2017
0 – 31.6%
2020
100 – 100%
2021
100 – 100%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2015
Clínica IFEM
No data
20
44.9 – 100%
0 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
IFEM CORDOBA S.L.P
No data
57
6.7 – 60%
1 – 99%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
IFEM CORDOBA S.L.P
No data
58
0 – 40.2%
0 – 86.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
IFEM CORDOBA S.L.P
No data
59
12 – 64.9%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
IFEM CORDOBA S.L.P
No data
78
0.5 – 49.5%
0 – 49.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
IFEM CORDOBA S.L.P
100-500
152
21.4 – 71.9%
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
IFEM CORDOBA S.L.P
100-500
267
35.4 – 82.2%
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
IFEM CORDOBA S.L.P
100-500
297
23.3 – 70.8%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
IFEM CORDOBA S.L.P
100-500
254
21.4 – 71.9%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.
