Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about Centro De Genetica Girona between 2014 and 2023: 10 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2014
54
2015
62
2016
55
2017
39
2018
48
2019
28
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2014
17
2015
17
2016
30
2017
14
2018
22
2019
27
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
19.1 – 73.3%
19 – 81%
2015
16 – 74.9%
2.5 – 64.1%
2016
54 – 99.8%
0 – 46.5%
2017
13.3 – 100%
23.1 – 88%
2018
0 – 55%
0 – 35.4%
2019
—
0 – 86.7%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
35.1 – 88%
44.1 – 94.3%
2015
12.6 – 58%
24.9 – 69.8%
2016
26.7 – 80.9%
—
2017
0 – 55%
0 – 86.7%
2018
0 – 24%
35.9 – 97.5%
2019
0 – 55.1%
0 – 35.4%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
13.3 – 100%
0 – 100%
2015
0 – 82.9%
—
2016
7.9 – 64.8%
0 – 55%
2017
0 – 37.8%
—
2018
—
0 – 86.7%
2019
—
0 – 55%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2015
100 – 100%
13.3 – 100%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
100 – 100%
1 – 99%
2015
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
2016
0 – 82.9%
0 – 100%
2017
100 – 100%
—
2018
0 – 86.7%
—
2019
13.3 – 100%
0 – 82.9%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
0 – 100%
0 – 40.2%
2015
2.5 – 64.1%
—
2016
23.3 – 70.8%
0 – 46.5%
2017
0 – 82.9%
17.1 – 100%
2018
—
0 – 26.1%
2019
—
0 – 41%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2014
0 – 20.7%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
0 – 10.8%
2016
2.5 – 37.5%
2017
0 – 37.8%
2019
17.1 – 100%
2021
100 – 100%
2023
0 – 100%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 37.9%
2016
0 – 28.7%
2017
0 – 55.1%
2018
0 – 35.4%
2019
100 – 100%
2021
0 – 86.7%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2014
10.1 – 34.4%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
0 – 24%
2016
0 – 71.1%
2017
0 – 55.1%
2019
100 – 100%
2020
1 – 99%
2022
0 – 67.4%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
7.3 – 40.7%
2016
14.1 – 55.9%
2017
0 – 44.8%
2019
6.2 – 79.5%
2021
0 – 49.4%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2014
Centro De Genetica Girona
71
19.1 – 73.3%
0 – 20.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
Centro De Genetica Girona
79
16 – 74.9%
0 – 10.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
Centro De Genetica Girona
85
54 – 99.8%
2.5 – 37.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
Centro De Genetica Girona
53
13.3 – 100%
0 – 37.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
Centro De Genetica Girona
70
0 – 55%
0 – 35.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
Centro De Genetica Girona
55
No data
17.1 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
Centro De Genetica Girona
No data
No data
1 – 99%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
Centro De Genetica Girona
No data
No data
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
Centro De Genetica Girona
No data
No data
0 – 67.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
Centro De Genetica Girona
No data
No data
0 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.