Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about MAR&Gen between 2014 and 2022: 9 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2014
143
2015
113
2016
128
2017
117
2018
136
2019
87
2020
106
2021
111
2022
75
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2014
168
2015
141
2016
147
2017
112
2018
122
2019
101
2020
67
2021
74
2022
49
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
38.8 – 75.5%
9.5 – 57.2%
2015
25.6 – 61.1%
4.3 – 49%
2016
1.2 – 26.3%
18.8 – 55.3%
2017
15.2 – 58.5%
13.6 – 43.5%
2018
56 – 94%
38.6 – 83.6%
2019
38.8 – 86.2%
25.1 – 84%
2020
9.5 – 57.2%
15.2 – 58.5%
2021
12 – 64.9%
6.5 – 46.1%
2022
0 – 44.8%
25.1 – 84%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
9 – 41%
8.9 – 36.8%
2015
13.1 – 45%
6.7 – 60%
2016
11.6 – 49.2%
0 – 33.9%
2017
4.9 – 52.2%
7.9 – 64.8%
2018
14.6 – 46%
29.3 – 67%
2019
8.5 – 54%
13.8 – 61.2%
2020
4.3 – 49%
16.4 – 61.4%
2021
0 – 35.8%
9.9 – 44%
2022
0 – 25.6%
9.6 – 70.4%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
16.3 – 56.5%
0 – 30.5%
2015
11.6 – 49.2%
—
2016
1.8 – 31.6%
0 – 62%
2017
8.6 – 39.7%
0 – 31.6%
2018
4.9 – 38.6%
0 – 19.3%
2019
0 – 13.9%
0 – 62%
2020
7.7 – 42.3%
0 – 30.5%
2021
10.4 – 45.6%
0 – 41%
2022
0 – 37.8%
10.6 – 60.8%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
35.9 – 97.5%
0 – 55.1%
2015
29 – 96%
0 – 100%
2016
10 – 90%
20.5 – 93.8%
2017
32.6 – 100%
—
2018
17.1 – 100%
0 – 86.7%
2019
0 – 82.9%
—
2020
1 – 99%
32.6 – 100%
2021
—
0 – 46.5%
2022
100 – 100%
0 – 86.7%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
19.1 – 73.3%
7.9 – 64.8%
2015
28.1 – 78.6%
6.2 – 79.5%
2016
13.8 – 61.2%
0 – 31.6%
2017
7.9 – 64.8%
1.6 – 58.4%
2018
9.6 – 70.4%
4 – 71%
2019
38 – 100%
100 – 100%
2020
—
0 – 86.7%
2021
10 – 90%
0.2 – 46%
2022
0 – 67.4%
0 – 86.7%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
54.3 – 75%
18.6 – 45.2%
2015
53.3 – 76.1%
26.4 – 56.5%
2016
49.9 – 73.9%
27.1 – 55.5%
2017
35.3 – 62.7%
23.6 – 57.6%
2018
33.8 – 62%
19.1 – 46.2%
2019
45.2 – 71.8%
8.6 – 39.7%
2020
34 – 69.2%
45.8 – 84.7%
2021
36.3 – 76.8%
13.7 – 50.3%
2022
6 – 44%
51.5 – 92.9%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2014
0 – 71.1%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2017
0 – 100%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2014
0.5 – 49.5%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
0 – 55.1%
2016
0 – 86.7%
2017
0 – 86.7%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2014
MAR&Gen
100-500
311
38.8 – 75.5%
0 – 71.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
MAR&Gen
No data
254
25.6 – 61.1%
0 – 55.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
MAR&Gen
No data
275
1.2 – 26.3%
0 – 86.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
MAR&Gen
No data
229
15.2 – 58.5%
0 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
MAR&Gen
No data
258
56 – 94%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
MAR&Gen
No data
188
38.8 – 86.2%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
MAR&Gen
No data
173
9.5 – 57.2%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
MAR&Gen
No data
185
12 – 64.9%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
MAR&Gen
No data
124
0 – 44.8%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.