Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about Fiv Recoletos Guadalajara between 2009 and 2016: 8 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2009
257
2010
278
2011
351
2012
270
2013
220
2014
255
2015
190
2016
179
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2009
11
2010
19
2011
21
2012
24
2013
11
2014
16
2015
15
2016
4
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
27.8 – 42%
29.6 – 44%
2010
25.5 – 42.9%
29.4 – 47.3%
2011
34.8 – 51.4%
46.1 – 62.8%
2012
38.6 – 62.9%
38.6 – 60.4%
2013
43.3 – 67.5%
41.7 – 62.8%
2014
36 – 57.1%
30.2 – 57.8%
2015
26 – 51.2%
16.5 – 50.2%
2016
56.1 – 80.9%
15.6 – 51.1%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
23.3 – 38.6%
24.5 – 40%
2010
9 – 20.3%
12.8 – 25.3%
2011
26.4 – 40.3%
30.9 – 45.2%
2012
30.7 – 53.1%
28.6 – 47.7%
2013
26.9 – 47.8%
30.6 – 50.2%
2014
23.7 – 44.6%
11.8 – 45.3%
2015
37.1 – 62.9%
21.5 – 52.2%
2016
30.8 – 53.7%
8.5 – 54%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
1.3 – 27.2%
1.8 – 28.2%
2010
11.3 – 26.7%
14.8 – 31.2%
2011
15.5 – 34.5%
17.3 – 36.8%
2012
6.7 – 26.6%
4.6 – 19.1%
2013
5.2 – 40.2%
3.9 – 33.2%
2014
2.5 – 64.1%
0 – 86.7%
2015
6.2 – 79.5%
—
2016
0 – 35.4%
0 – 86.7%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2010
0 – 100%
0 – 100%
2011
0 – 100%
100 – 100%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2013
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
2014
13.3 – 100%
—
2015
100 – 100%
0 – 100%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
17.1 – 100%
17.1 – 100%
2010
10 – 90%
10 – 90%
2011
0 – 62%
0 – 62%
2012
6.2 – 79.5%
64.6 – 100%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2014
53.5 – 100%
—
2015
100 – 100%
—
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
6.2 – 79.5%
6.2 – 79.5%
2010
9.6 – 70.4%
9.6 – 70.4%
2011
19.1 – 73.3%
26.7 – 80.9%
2012
23.1 – 88%
32.5 – 92.5%
2013
0 – 86.7%
0 – 100%
2014
100 – 100%
—
2015
0 – 82.9%
100 – 100%
2016
—
13.3 – 100%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
0.4 – 14.7%
2010
0.3 – 12.4%
2011
4.5 – 18.9%
2012
6.2 – 24.8%
2013
2.3 – 16.8%
2014
0 – 24.7%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 26.1%
2016
0 – 55.1%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
10.4 – 45.6%
2010
11 – 47.4%
2011
8.1 – 44%
2012
1.5 – 29.3%
2013
0 – 37.9%
2014
6.2 – 79.5%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2016
100 – 100%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2016
0 – 71.1%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2009
FIV Recoletos Guadalajara
No data
268
27.8 – 42%
0.4 – 14.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF
2010
Fiv Recoletos Guadalajara
100-500
297
25.5 – 42.9%
0.3 – 12.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2010-Registro SEF
2011
Fiv Recoletos Guadalajara
100-500
372
34.8 – 51.4%
4.5 – 18.9%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF
2012
Fiv Recoletos Guadalajara
100-500
294
38.6 – 62.9%
6.2 – 24.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013
Fiv Recoletos Guadalajara
100-500
231
43.3 – 67.5%
2.3 – 16.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF
2014
Fiv Recoletos Guadalajara
100-500
271
36 – 57.1%
0 – 24.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
Fiv Recoletos Guadalajara
100-500
205
26 – 51.2%
0 – 26.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
Fiv Recoletos Guadalajara
100-500
183
56.1 – 80.9%
0 – 55.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.