Skip to content
ClinicasReproduccionAsistida.es
Private centreOfficial 2012 data

Clínica El Pilar

Results for Clínica El Pilar in Guipúzcoa from Spain’s official Ministry of Health registry: reporting is mandatory, and more than 10% of centres are audited each year by an independent body.

Phone:
663036158
Website:
www.csvp.com
Medical director:
Agustín Aguirre

No activity recorded in the SEF Registry since 2012: this centre does not appear in the most recent census. The results on this page are from 2012, the last year for which the registry publishes its detailed profile.

IVF/ICSI with own oocytes

In vitro fertilisation using the patient’s own eggs.

Pregnancy probability per transfer, by the woman’s age

Out of every 100 embryo transfers performed at this centre, how many resulted in a pregnancy, by the woman’s age.

  • This clinic (published interval)

Fresh embryos

Under 3536.2 – 66.1%
Between 35 and 3919.9 – 45.4%
Over 400 – 32.6%

Frozen embryos

Under 3542.4 – 68.9%
Between 35 and 3915.5 – 36.8%
Over 400 – 27.1%

Treatment year: 2012.

Cycles started that year: between 100 and 500 (the registry publishes bands, not exact figures).

Why is this measure important?

It is the figure closest to the question “what are my chances?”: the outcome of each transfer, in your age group. The woman’s age is the factor that weighs most on the result — which is why we never show a single overall rate.

Detailed explanation

The registry publishes every rate as an interval: the floor and the ceiling of the centre’s estimate. A wide interval usually means few cycles (more chance at play); a narrow one, more activity. Important: the Spanish registry publishes pregnancies, not live births — some pregnancies do not reach term, so this is not a birth rate. And each clinic treats different patients: comparing raw figures between centres can be misleading.

Embryo implantation rate

Out of every 100 embryos transferred at this centre, how many implanted in the uterus.

  • This clinic (published interval)
No fresh/frozen split18.6 – 30%

Treatment year: 2012.

Why is this measure important?

It measures the outcome embryo by embryo — the finest denominator the registry publishes: it lets you compare centres that transfer a different number of embryos per attempt.

Detailed explanation

It is calculated per embryo transferred, not per transfer: if two embryos are transferred and one implants, the transfer counts as a pregnancy, but implantation is 50%. The registry publishes it as an interval, without an age breakdown. It measures implantation, not a full-term pregnancy or a birth.

Egg donation

In vitro fertilisation with eggs provided by a donor.

Pregnancy probability per transfer, by the woman’s age

Out of every 100 embryo transfers performed at this centre, how many resulted in a pregnancy, by the woman’s age.

  • This clinic (published interval)

Fresh embryos

Under 3550.6 – 100%
Between 35 and 3942.2 – 74.4%
Over 4032.1 – 67.9%

Frozen embryos

Under 35100 – 100%
Between 35 and 3962.8 – 89%
Over 4043.8 – 77.7%

Treatment year: 2012.

Why is this measure important?

In egg donation the decisive factor is the donor’s age, not the recipient’s: that is why its rates are higher and more stable than IVF with own eggs, and why it is shown as a separate section — mixing them would be misleading.

Detailed explanation

Same measure as IVF with own oocytes (pregnancy per transfer, published as an interval), with eggs provided by a donor. “Fresh” and “frozen” refer to the embryos transferred. Here too the registry publishes pregnancies, not births.

Embryo implantation rate

Out of every 100 embryos transferred at this centre, how many implanted in the uterus.

  • This clinic (published interval)
No fresh/frozen split32.4 – 48.1%

Treatment year: 2012.

Why is this measure important?

It measures the outcome embryo by embryo — the finest denominator the registry publishes: it lets you compare centres that transfer a different number of embryos per attempt.

Detailed explanation

It is calculated per embryo transferred, not per transfer: if two embryos are transferred and one implants, the transfer counts as a pregnancy, but implantation is 50%. The registry publishes it as an interval, without an age breakdown. It measures implantation, not a full-term pregnancy or a birth.

Artificial insemination

Pregnancy probability per cycle started

Pregnancy rate per cycle in women under 40.

  • This clinic (published interval)

AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm)

The partner’s sperm, prepared and placed in the uterus.

Under 402.9 – 20.6%

AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm)

Donor sperm placed in the uterus.

Under 408.7 – 45.9%

Treatment year: 2012.

Why is this measure important?

Insemination is the least complex technique and also the one with the lowest probability per attempt: the measure is pregnancy per cycle started, not per transfer, because insemination involves no embryo transfer.

Detailed explanation

AIH means insemination with the partner’s sperm; AID, with donor sperm. The registry publishes the pregnancy percentage per cycle as an interval, stratified by the woman’s age (up to 2014, a single “under 40” band). These are recorded pregnancies, not births.

Other techniques

Pregnancy probability per transfer (intervals as published by the registry).

TechniqueNo fresh/frozen split
PGT (preimplantation genetic testing)16 – 74.9%
Thawing of own eggs (devitrification)0 – 0%
Sperm donation30.3 – 63.8%
Embryo donation0 – 0%

Treatment year: 2012.

Why is this measure important?

These techniques do not fit the sections above, but the registry publishes their results too: they matter if your treatment involves PGT, vitrified eggs, or embryo or sperm donation.

Detailed explanation

Each row is the pregnancy probability per transfer for that technique, as published by the registry (intervals, never reduced to a single number). PGT is published as a rate per transfer — not as the share of cycles using PGT.

IVF/ICSI with own oocytes

Activity volume

This centre recorded between 100 and 500 IVF/ICSI with own oocytes cycles started in 2012.

The registry publishes cycles started as bands, not exact figures — and that is how they are shown.

Embryos per transfer

The SEF recommends transferring 1 or 2 embryos whenever possible.

All transfers

  • 1 embryo: 32
  • 2 embryos: 101
  • 3 embryos: 3

Type of pregnancy achieved

A singleton pregnancy is the best outcome after fertility treatment. Composition of recorded pregnancies: these are pregnancies, not deliveries.

Fresh transfers · with 1 embryo

  • Singleton: 100%
  • Twin: 0%
  • Triplet or more: 0%

Fresh transfers · with 2 embryos

  • Singleton: 78.9%
  • Twin: 21.1%
  • Triplet or more: 0%

Fresh transfers · with 3 embryos

  • Singleton: 100%
  • Twin: 0%
  • Triplet or more: 0%

Egg donation

Embryos per transfer

The SEF recommends transferring 1 or 2 embryos whenever possible.

All transfers

  • 1 embryo: 15
  • 2 embryos: 98
  • 3 embryos: 0

Type of pregnancy achieved

A singleton pregnancy is the best outcome after fertility treatment. Composition of recorded pregnancies: these are pregnancies, not deliveries.

Fresh transfers · with 1 embryo

  • Singleton: 100%
  • Twin: 0%
  • Triplet or more: 0%

Fresh transfers · with 2 embryos

  • Singleton: 61%
  • Twin: 39%
  • Triplet or more: 0%

Fresh transfers · with 3 embryos

Artificial insemination

Composition of recorded pregnancies: these are pregnancies, not deliveries.

AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · all ages

  • singleton: 6
  • twin: 0
  • triplet or more: 0

AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · all ages

  • singleton: 2
  • twin: 3
  • triplet or more: 1

How this centre has changed

The registry publishes 4 years of data for this centre, from 2009 to 2012.

See the full historical series →

Services registered in the SEF census

  • FIV/ICSI
  • Donación de ovocitos
  • FIV/ICSI
  • Donación de ovocitos
  • PGT
  • IAC
  • IAD

The registry census lists the services each centre declares; it does not publish the ones it does not offer, so nothing here is marked as “not available”.

Source: “Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF” (Spanish National ART Activity Registry) — registrosef.com, retrieved 31 July 2026. 2012 activity data. The registry publishes with a ~2-year lag; this is the most recent year with data for this centre.