Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about Ciudad de Jaén between 2009 and 2023: 15 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2009
188
2010
174
2011
232
2012
296
2013
332
2014
400
2015
454
2016
405
2017
463
2018
466
2019
456
2020
309
2021
390
2022
335
2023
405
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2015
6
2016
8
2017
7
2018
4
2019
6
2021
13
2022
3
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
24.8 – 43.1%
29.5 – 48.3%
2010
17.1 – 32.9%
22.5 – 39.4%
2011
25.2 – 40.6%
29 – 44.9%
2012
0 – 0%
—
2013
30.5 – 48.7%
34.1 – 51.4%
2014
18.1 – 31.9%
11.1 – 28.4%
2015
15.9 – 30.1%
16.2 – 31.7%
2016
17.6 – 33.7%
23.7 – 41.1%
2017
18.8 – 34.6%
19.5 – 35.5%
2018
11.6 – 28%
22.4 – 39.1%
2019
21.3 – 39.4%
16.8 – 31.6%
2020
10.7 – 32.2%
17.3 – 35.4%
2021
18.4 – 39.2%
21.8 – 41.1%
2022
8.7 – 28.6%
19.5 – 38.3%
2023
11.4 – 28.2%
18.8 – 37.4%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
14.3 – 31%
14.3 – 31%
2010
13 – 31.7%
13 – 31.7%
2011
16.8 – 33.2%
19.3 – 36.1%
2012
0 – 0%
—
2013
16.7 – 33.3%
22.3 – 39.4%
2014
6.8 – 19.7%
9.4 – 30.6%
2015
11.7 – 25.4%
9.8 – 28.5%
2016
10.8 – 26.3%
8.4 – 27.7%
2017
6.9 – 18.1%
10.3 – 28.6%
2018
9.7 – 22.6%
10 – 25.1%
2019
17.3 – 33.6%
12.6 – 31.8%
2020
15 – 35.8%
16.3 – 42%
2021
14.4 – 31.7%
16.7 – 34.3%
2022
8.5 – 25.3%
17.8 – 42.5%
2023
8.6 – 23.4%
15.1 – 31.9%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2010
4.9 – 52.2%
4.9 – 52.2%
2011
4.3 – 49%
7 – 53.6%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2013
1.6 – 58.4%
0.5 – 49.5%
2014
—
0 – 55.1%
2015
—
0 – 31.6%
2016
0 – 49.4%
0 – 42.9%
2017
0 – 26.1%
1 – 99%
2018
4.3 – 35.7%
0 – 37.8%
2019
0 – 22.2%
—
2020
3.3 – 30%
0 – 27.1%
2021
0 – 21.4%
0 – 32.6%
2022
1 – 23.3%
0 – 20.2%
2023
3.7 – 32%
0 – 28.6%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2010
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2015
—
1 – 99%
2016
—
100 – 100%
2021
—
0 – 100%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2010
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2016
100 – 100%
0 – 67.4%
2018
—
100 – 100%
2021
—
0 – 86.7%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2010
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2016
—
100 – 100%
2017
100 – 100%
13.3 – 100%
2018
—
0 – 100%
2021
—
0 – 55%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
3.5 – 8.2%
2010
3.7 – 8.5%
2011
6.9 – 12.6%
2012
5.1 – 11.1%
2013
4.5 – 11%
2014
5.7 – 13.3%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
2.4 – 10.6%
2016
3.9 – 12.4%
2017
6.5 – 16.1%
2018
3.9 – 14%
2019
6.9 – 19.2%
2020
7.1 – 19.7%
2021
9.3 – 22.9%
2022
5.3 – 18.4%
2023
5.3 – 17.4%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
3.1 – 15.1%
2016
3 – 14.8%
2017
3.3 – 16.2%
2018
7.8 – 24.6%
2019
5.5 – 22.6%
2020
0 – 10.5%
2021
7.3 – 23.1%
2022
3.4 – 19.2%
2023
4 – 19.1%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
10.6 – 30.6%
2010
10.6 – 30.6%
2011
12.5 – 29.2%
2012
13.6 – 33%
2013
17.1 – 43.7%
2014
5.6 – 22.9%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
8.2 – 28.9%
2016
6 – 24%
2017
21.5 – 52.2%
2018
0 – 12.7%
2019
4.8 – 25.6%
2020
2.8 – 26.6%
2021
6.6 – 28.9%
2022
2.6 – 25.2%
2023
1.6 – 30.4%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
2.3 – 22.7%
2016
0 – 14.3%
2017
3.5 – 31%
2018
1 – 23.3%
2019
6.2 – 24.8%
2020
0.8 – 21.4%
2021
2.5 – 18.2%
2022
1.6 – 18%
2023
2.5 – 18.2%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2009
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
188
24.8 – 43.1%
3.5 – 8.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF
2010
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
174
17.1 – 32.9%
3.7 – 8.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2010-Registro SEF
2011
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
232
25.2 – 40.6%
6.9 – 12.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF
2012
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
296
0 – 0%
5.1 – 11.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
332
30.5 – 48.7%
4.5 – 11%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF
2014
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
400
18.1 – 31.9%
5.7 – 13.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
460
15.9 – 30.1%
2.4 – 10.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
413
17.6 – 33.7%
3.9 – 12.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
470
18.8 – 34.6%
6.5 – 16.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
470
11.6 – 28%
3.9 – 14%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
462
21.3 – 39.4%
6.9 – 19.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
309
10.7 – 32.2%
7.1 – 19.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
403
18.4 – 39.2%
9.3 – 22.9%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
338
8.7 – 28.6%
5.3 – 18.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
Ciudad de Jaén
100-500
405
11.4 – 28.2%
5.3 – 17.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.