Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about H. Principe De Asturias between 2009 and 2023: 14 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2009
386
2011
505
2012
616
2013
600
2014
641
2015
559
2016
565
2017
410
2018
192
2019
811
2020
595
2021
796
2022
854
2023
819
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2009
32
2011
27
2012
48
2013
12
2014
11
2015
9
2016
13
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
24 – 37.1%
24 – 37.1%
2011
25.6 – 36.5%
25.6 – 36.5%
2012
28 – 39.7%
25.6 – 36.1%
2013
28.2 – 41%
25.1 – 36.5%
2014
35.8 – 48.7%
9.6 – 33%
2015
35.5 – 49%
11.2 – 40.2%
2016
25.9 – 40.7%
19.6 – 48.7%
2017
23.4 – 39.6%
13.6 – 43.5%
2018
22.4 – 49.9%
16.5 – 44%
2019
24.3 – 38.1%
24.5 – 38.3%
2020
32.4 – 54%
32.1 – 48.4%
2021
32.2 – 48.7%
30.4 – 45.1%
2022
14.6 – 30%
29 – 41.7%
2023
25.1 – 45.5%
32.7 – 47.6%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
15.6 – 27.2%
15.6 – 27.2%
2011
20.3 – 30.6%
20.3 – 30.6%
2012
27.4 – 39%
23.7 – 33.7%
2013
23.1 – 34.1%
21.3 – 31.3%
2014
24.2 – 34.8%
8.1 – 34%
2015
28 – 39.8%
2.9 – 27.4%
2016
25.3 – 35.7%
0.8 – 20.3%
2017
24.2 – 37.9%
8.9 – 29.1%
2018
19.2 – 41.4%
12.5 – 43.7%
2019
21.9 – 32.7%
21.9 – 35.6%
2020
26.7 – 41.8%
22.9 – 36.3%
2021
24.4 – 36.2%
27.3 – 39.6%
2022
31.4 – 43.8%
30.9 – 42.9%
2023
26.9 – 39.8%
31.7 – 43.3%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
1.7 – 18.3%
1.7 – 18.3%
2011
4.3 – 35.7%
4.3 – 35.7%
2012
31.4 – 65.5%
25.6 – 56.5%
2013
2.7 – 39.4%
2.3 – 35.8%
2014
11.2 – 40.2%
—
2015
8.2 – 38.5%
—
2016
17.2 – 54.8%
0 – 86.7%
2017
0.5 – 49.5%
—
2019
0 – 21.1%
0 – 35.8%
2020
0 – 13.9%
11.6 – 49.2%
2021
4.9 – 52.2%
5.6 – 42%
2022
4.1 – 34.4%
0.5 – 49.5%
2023
7.3 – 35.2%
10.6 – 30.6%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
15.4 – 84.6%
15.4 – 84.6%
2011
0 – 42.9%
0 – 42.9%
2012
6.7 – 60%
30.4 – 86.2%
2013
0 – 86.7%
0 – 55.1%
2014
0 – 67.4%
—
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
19.4 – 68.1%
19.4 – 68.1%
2011
5.7 – 55.9%
5.7 – 55.9%
2012
0 – 25.7%
0 – 24.7%
2013
0 – 46.5%
0 – 35.4%
2014
32.6 – 100%
—
2015
0 – 67.4%
—
2016
0 – 46.5%
—
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
4 – 71%
4 – 71%
2011
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
4.9 – 11.9%
2011
6.9 – 15.5%
2012
9.2 – 17.3%
2013
8.3 – 16.8%
2014
8.6 – 16.3%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
6.1 – 17.2%
2016
7.2 – 17.8%
2018
4.2 – 14.8%
2019
100 – 100%
2020
1 – 24%
2021
10.3 – 32.9%
2022
5.3 – 19.7%
2023
6 – 19.5%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
4.9 – 22.7%
2016
4.5 – 20.9%
2018
5.2 – 27.3%
2019
100 – 100%
2020
0 – 12.7%
2021
0 – 22.2%
2022
0 – 13.9%
2023
8.1 – 31%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
6.1 – 24.4%
2011
10.1 – 34.4%
2012
11.3 – 35.5%
2013
3.3 – 22.8%
2014
3.3 – 22.8%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
3.8 – 46.2%
2016
0 – 24.3%
2018
12.4 – 51.3%
2019
100 – 100%
2020
0 – 16.1%
2021
14.5 – 52.2%
2022
14.2 – 47.9%
2023
6.6 – 28.9%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
9.6 – 70.4%
2016
0 – 46.5%
2019
100 – 100%
2020
0 – 22.2%
2021
0 – 18.4%
2022
0 – 15.6%
2023
3.1 – 21.9%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2009
H. Principe De Asturias
No data
418
24 – 37.1%
4.9 – 11.9%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF
2010
No data
2011
H. Principe De Asturias
No data
532
25.6 – 36.5%
6.9 – 15.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF
2012
H. Principe De Asturias
No data
664
28 – 39.7%
9.2 – 17.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013
H. Principe De Asturias
> 500
612
28.2 – 41%
8.3 – 16.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF
2014
H. Principe De Asturias
> 500 · 100-500
652
35.8 – 48.7%
8.6 – 16.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
H. Principe De Asturias
> 500 · 100-500
568
35.5 – 49%
6.1 – 17.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
H. Principe De Asturias
> 500 · 100-500
578
25.9 – 40.7%
7.2 – 17.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
H. Principe De Asturias
100-500
410
23.4 – 39.6%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
H. Principe De Asturias
100-500
192
22.4 – 49.9%
4.2 – 14.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
H. Principe De Asturias
> 500 · 100-500
811
24.3 – 38.1%
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
H. Principe De Asturias
> 500 · 100-500
595
32.4 – 54%
1 – 24%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
H. Principe De Asturias
> 500 · 100-500
796
32.2 – 48.7%
10.3 – 32.9%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
H. Principe De Asturias
100-500
854
14.6 – 30%
5.3 – 19.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
H. Principe De Asturias
> 500 · 100-500
819
25.1 – 45.5%
6 – 19.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.