Hospital Ruber Internacional-CENTRO MEDICO MASÓ, year by year
Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about Hospital Ruber Internacional-CENTRO MEDICO MASÓ between 2009 and 2023: 15 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2009
163
2010
174
2011
176
2012
220
2013
244
2014
262
2015
187
2016
198
2017
179
2018
201
2019
160
2020
77
2021
74
2022
69
2023
92
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2009
17
2010
23
2011
32
2012
64
2013
70
2014
60
2015
52
2016
44
2017
47
2018
55
2019
57
2020
30
2021
5
2022
6
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
37.1 – 62.9%
37.1 – 62.9%
2010
30 – 53.6%
35.1 – 59%
2011
30 – 53.6%
56.3 – 78.7%
2012
36.2 – 66.1%
48.3 – 73.6%
2013
49 – 79.2%
52.9 – 78%
2014
31.4 – 65.5%
25.6 – 57.8%
2015
29.2 – 76.7%
30 – 70%
2016
42.8 – 90.5%
28.5 – 57.8%
2017
42 – 87.4%
46.8 – 78.9%
2018
0 – 71.1%
34.8 – 57.3%
2019
32.6 – 100%
45.7 – 74.3%
2020
0 – 86.7%
46.5 – 77.8%
2021
—
35.9 – 66.5%
2022
—
36.2 – 69.7%
2023
—
35.2 – 67.5%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
22.4 – 42%
28.6 – 49.1%
2010
30.5 – 50.3%
35.1 – 55.3%
2011
36.1 – 56.4%
47 – 67.1%
2012
28.5 – 50%
32.4 – 52%
2013
25.6 – 49.4%
36.9 – 58%
2014
26.7 – 49.8%
13.7 – 36.3%
2015
40.8 – 72.7%
37.1 – 62.9%
2016
40.7 – 74.4%
39.5 – 65.9%
2017
29.1 – 70.9%
39.7 – 65.6%
2018
9.5 – 57.2%
37.6 – 62.4%
2019
30.4 – 86.2%
40.1 – 62.6%
2020
0 – 100%
44.1 – 78.4%
2021
—
40.7 – 75.4%
2022
—
30.8 – 66%
2023
100 – 100%
34.9 – 65.1%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
13.1 – 45%
20 – 53.9%
2010
5 – 31.3%
9.1 – 38%
2011
11.6 – 34.5%
21.7 – 47.5%
2012
3.9 – 33.2%
4.8 – 27.3%
2013
6.7 – 33.3%
10 – 31.4%
2014
13.3 – 40.4%
24.5 – 61.2%
2015
24.6 – 59.3%
14.1 – 55.9%
2016
7.3 – 40.7%
24.5 – 63.5%
2017
0 – 35.8%
15.8 – 48.7%
2018
—
32.7 – 67.3%
2019
0 – 55.1%
3 – 41.4%
2020
—
0 – 67.4%
2022
—
100 – 100%
2023
—
1 – 53.6%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
1 – 99%
25.1 – 100%
2010
0 – 100%
15 – 100%
2011
13.3 – 100%
100 – 100%
2012
0 – 40.2%
6.2 – 79.5%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 100%
2014
100 – 100%
—
2015
0 – 100%
100 – 100%
2016
0 – 100%
—
2018
—
13.3 – 100%
2022
—
100 – 100%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
17.1 – 100%
17.1 – 100%
2010
23.1 – 88%
62 – 100%
2011
40 – 93.3%
56.2 – 100%
2012
4 – 71%
8.7 – 77.4%
2013
6.7 – 60%
39.2 – 89.4%
2014
10 – 90%
0 – 62%
2015
4 – 71%
—
2016
29 – 96%
32.6 – 100%
2017
13.3 – 100%
1 – 99%
2018
13.3 – 100%
13.3 – 100%
2019
32.6 – 100%
6.2 – 79.5%
2020
100 – 100%
—
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
9.6 – 70.4%
24.2 – 85.8%
2010
19.1 – 73.3%
44.9 – 94.8%
2011
35.4 – 82.2%
80.5 – 100%
2012
31 – 73.7%
93.9 – 100%
2013
41.5 – 84.8%
53 – 88%
2014
30.8 – 69.2%
13.8 – 61.2%
2015
45.2 – 82.8%
21.4 – 71.9%
2016
35.4 – 82.2%
46.4 – 99%
2017
49.9 – 90.1%
14.1 – 55.9%
2018
33.2 – 76.8%
27 – 65.3%
2019
38.6 – 78.1%
26.3 – 69%
2020
29 – 96%
24.9 – 69.8%
2021
—
17.1 – 100%
2022
—
44.9 – 100%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
1 – 11.8%
2010
0.9 – 11.4%
2011
4.3 – 15.3%
2012
3.5 – 15.2%
2013
4.4 – 20.6%
2014
2.9 – 14.5%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2016
2.1 – 21.7%
2017
4.3 – 35.7%
2018
5.9 – 35.4%
2019
2.6 – 25.2%
2020
3 – 28.2%
2021
21.7 – 78.3%
2022
1.1 – 24.7%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
1.6 – 17.3%
2016
0 – 14.6%
2017
0 – 23.8%
2018
0 – 20.2%
2019
3.8 – 46.2%
2020
23.1 – 88%
2021
0 – 32.6%
2022
0 – 13.2%
2023
0 – 44.8%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
0 – 0%
2010
0 – 0%
2011
0 – 0%
2012
0 – 22.2%
2013
0 – 44.8%
2014
0 – 24%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2016
0 – 100%
2020
0 – 46.5%
2021
100 – 100%
2023
0 – 71.1%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2016
0 – 62%
2019
100 – 100%
2020
0 – 67.4%
2021
0 – 46.5%
2022
0 – 86.7%
2023
0 – 35.4%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2009
Clinica Ruber Internacional
100-500
180
37.1 – 62.9%
1 – 11.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF
2010
Clinica Ruber Internacional
100-500
197
30 – 53.6%
0.9 – 11.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2010-Registro SEF
2011
Clinica Ruber Internacional
100-500
208
30 – 53.6%
4.3 – 15.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF
2012
Clinica Ruber Internacional
100-500
284
36.2 – 66.1%
3.5 – 15.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013
Clinica Ruber Internacional
100-500
314
49 – 79.2%
4.4 – 20.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF
2014
Clinica Ruber Internacional
100-500
322
31.4 – 65.5%
2.9 – 14.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
Clinica Ruber Internacional
100-500
239
29.2 – 76.7%
1.6 – 17.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
Hospital Ruber Internacional
100-500
242
42.8 – 90.5%
2.1 – 21.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
Hospital Ruber Internacional
100-500
226
42 – 87.4%
4.3 – 35.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
Hospital Ruber Internacional
100-500
256
0 – 71.1%
5.9 – 35.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
Hospital Ruber Internacional
100-500
217
32.6 – 100%
2.6 – 25.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
Hospital Ruber Internacional-CENTRO MEDICO MASÓ
No data
107
0 – 86.7%
3 – 28.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
Hospital Ruber Internacional-CENTRO MEDICO MASÓ
No data
79
No data
21.7 – 78.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
Hospital Ruber Internacional-CENTRO MEDICO MASÓ
No data
75
No data
1.1 – 24.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
Hospital Ruber Internacional-CENTRO MEDICO MASÓ
No data
92
No data
0 – 44.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.