Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about IVF Spain Madrid between 2011 and 2023: 13 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2011
98
2012
166
2013
196
2014
221
2015
148
2016
177
2017
177
2018
183
2019
214
2020
125
2021
118
2022
120
2023
126
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2011
282
2012
488
2013
498
2014
525
2015
595
2016
599
2017
547
2018
397
2019
363
2020
188
2021
184
2022
130
2023
176
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2011
9.6 – 38.9%
33.4 – 67.6%
2012
28 – 64.9%
46.6 – 79.1%
2013
24.7 – 56.4%
20.1 – 48.1%
2014
20.4 – 51.8%
3.5 – 31%
2015
35.8 – 70.4%
13.8 – 61.2%
2016
36.5 – 75.5%
20.3 – 55.6%
2017
59.8 – 94.8%
27.4 – 68.2%
2018
38.6 – 83.6%
35.1 – 72%
2019
43.5 – 83.7%
35.6 – 67%
2020
0 – 82.9%
36.5 – 75.5%
2021
5.7 – 55.9%
31.5 – 68.5%
2022
17.1 – 100%
14.9 – 42.2%
2023
1.6 – 58.4%
18.5 – 48.1%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2011
13.2 – 36.8%
20.2 – 45.8%
2012
14.9 – 39%
21.4 – 45.7%
2013
23.4 – 46.3%
19.4 – 39.6%
2014
27.2 – 57.8%
14.5 – 43.4%
2015
31.5 – 68.5%
16.3 – 56.5%
2016
24.9 – 54.1%
8.6 – 39.7%
2017
25.6 – 61.1%
16.3 – 45.3%
2018
27.2 – 57.8%
17.2 – 49.4%
2019
28 – 59.2%
28.4 – 56.7%
2020
9.2 – 47.9%
18.6 – 50%
2021
7.8 – 51.1%
20.1 – 48.1%
2022
7.8 – 51.1%
30.5 – 61.8%
2023
0 – 41%
12.4 – 36.5%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2011
14.1 – 44.7%
16.9 – 48.4%
2012
3.5 – 31%
5 – 28.4%
2013
8.4 – 34.9%
6.4 – 28.3%
2014
4.5 – 24.1%
14.2 – 47.9%
2015
6.7 – 33.3%
4.3 – 49%
2016
7.6 – 32.4%
0 – 26.1%
2017
8.9 – 36.8%
3.7 – 32%
2018
17.9 – 50.8%
12.5 – 43.7%
2019
4.7 – 29.6%
23.6 – 57.6%
2020
9.5 – 57.2%
14.5 – 52.2%
2021
—
0 – 62%
2022
0 – 86.7%
0 – 20.6%
2023
0 – 49.4%
0 – 35.4%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2011
27 – 65.3%
53.2 – 88.2%
2012
28 – 64.9%
41.3 – 76.5%
2013
42.3 – 75.4%
42.3 – 75.4%
2014
47 – 75.8%
10.6 – 60.8%
2015
41.1 – 69.5%
18.5 – 61.5%
2016
19.2 – 51.4%
12.6 – 58%
2017
37.3 – 72.4%
0 – 32.2%
2018
79.4 – 100%
0 – 37.8%
2019
15.4 – 84.6%
14.1 – 55.9%
2020
0 – 100%
0 – 71.1%
2021
—
1 – 99%
2022
0 – 100%
0 – 46.5%
2023
—
1 – 99%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2011
28.6 – 52%
41.7 – 65.6%
2012
34 – 57.4%
46.2 – 68.5%
2013
43.4 – 66.2%
42 – 64.6%
2014
53.3 – 76.1%
14.1 – 55.9%
2015
47.2 – 68.5%
16 – 46.8%
2016
42.4 – 68%
12.9 – 39.5%
2017
50.6 – 75.7%
10.4 – 41.2%
2018
36.2 – 69.7%
27.3 – 59.2%
2019
41.1 – 82.7%
21.9 – 54.6%
2020
0 – 55%
19.2 – 59.1%
2021
53.5 – 100%
9.4 – 42.5%
2022
—
0 – 30.5%
2023
13.3 – 100%
25.7 – 63.2%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2011
44.8 – 58.8%
59.9 – 73.1%
2012
41.5 – 54.3%
56.2 – 68.3%
2013
53.1 – 65.6%
51.9 – 64.3%
2014
47.6 – 59.7%
29.4 – 46.9%
2015
49.3 – 61.8%
21.9 – 35.6%
2016
43.7 – 55.9%
28.5 – 42%
2017
51 – 65.2%
28.7 – 41.2%
2018
54.1 – 71.2%
28.5 – 42.6%
2019
43.8 – 63%
39 – 53.7%
2020
35.6 – 64.4%
27.6 – 46.2%
2021
35.5 – 71.2%
24.2 – 41.3%
2022
6 – 44%
22.5 – 42.6%
2023
38.5 – 79.6%
26.5 – 43.5%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2011
2.6 – 25.2%
2012
0 – 21.1%
2013
0 – 0%
2014
0 – 23.8%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
0 – 40.2%
2019
0 – 71.1%
2022
0 – 55%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2016
0 – 67.4%
2017
0 – 55.1%
2019
0 – 100%
2021
0 – 46.5%
2022
0 – 40.2%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2011
0 – 24.7%
2012
1.1 – 24.7%
2013
4.1 – 22.3%
2014
4.6 – 24.6%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
9.5 – 57.2%
2016
0 – 42.9%
2017
1 – 99%
2018
0 – 71.1%
2019
0 – 37.9%
2020
0 – 49.4%
2021
15.2 – 64.8%
2022
0 – 26.1%
2023
0 – 32.6%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 20.2%
2016
6.5 – 46.1%
2018
0.2 – 46%
2019
9.5 – 57.2%
2020
0 – 28.7%
2021
0 – 27.1%
2023
9.6 – 70.4%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2011
Procreatec
100-500
380
9.6 – 38.9%
2.6 – 25.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF
2012
Procreatec
100-500
654
28 – 64.9%
0 – 21.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013
Procreatec
100-500
694
24.7 – 56.4%
0 – 0%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF
2014
Procreatec
100-500
746
20.4 – 51.8%
0 – 23.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
Procreatec
100-500
743
35.8 – 70.4%
0 – 40.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
Procreatec
100-500
776
36.5 – 75.5%
0 – 67.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
Procreatec
100-500
724
59.8 – 94.8%
0 – 55.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
Procreatec
100-500
580
38.6 – 83.6%
0 – 71.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
IVF Spain Madrid
100-500
577
43.5 – 83.7%
0 – 71.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
IVF Spain Madrid
100-500
313
0 – 82.9%
0 – 49.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
IVF Spain Madrid
100-500
302
5.7 – 55.9%
0 – 46.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
IVF Spain Madrid
100-500
250
17.1 – 100%
0 – 55%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
IVF Spain Madrid
100-500
302
1.6 – 58.4%
0 – 32.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.