Skip to content
ClinicasReproduccionAsistida.es

CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella), year by year

Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella) between 2009 and 2023: 13 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.

Volume first

Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.

Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
’09’10’11’12’13’14’1567’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
See this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
YearValue
200962
201048
201466
201561
201667
201722
201842
201937
202029
202133
202224
202337
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
226’09’10’11’12’13’14’15’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
See this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
YearValue
2009226
2010179
2014145
201598
201655
201761
201836
201917
20207
20217
20223

Results, year by year

Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.

IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
  • Fresh embryos
  • Frozen embryos
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
YearFresh embryosFrozen embryos
20099.9 – 50.1%54 – 92.7%
201016.9 – 68.8%62.1 – 100%
20120 – 0%0 – 0%
20140 – 32.6%8.5 – 54%
20154.3 – 49%0 – 100%
201624.9 – 69.8%29 – 96%
201720.5 – 93.8%1 – 99%
20180 – 82.9%12 – 76.9%
2019100 – 100%17.1 – 100%
20201 – 99%15.4 – 84.6%
2021—13.3 – 100%
20220 – 55.1%0 – 100%
20234 – 71%31.2 – 83.1%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
  • Fresh embryos
  • Frozen embryos
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
YearFresh embryosFrozen embryos
200921.9 – 54.6%43.8 – 76.7%
201016.3 – 52.9%38.7 – 76.7%
20120 – 0%0 – 0%
201438.6 – 83.6%0 – 49.4%
20152.3 – 35.8%17.1 – 100%
201617.8 – 64.6%15.4 – 84.6%
20170 – 82.9%0 – 86.7%
20181 – 53.6%4 – 71%
201910 – 90%41.6 – 98.4%
20206.2 – 79.5%0 – 86.7%
202115.4 – 84.6%0 – 35.4%
20220 – 49.4%0 – 67.4%
20230 – 46.5%—
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
  • Fresh embryos
  • Frozen embryos
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
YearFresh embryosFrozen embryos
20090 – 55%0 – 61.8%
201015.4 – 84.6%50.1 – 100%
20120 – 0%0 – 0%
201516.9 – 68.8%1 – 99%
201616 – 74.9%—
2018—13.3 – 100%
2019—0 – 55%
20200 – 82.9%0 – 100%
20210 – 55%0 – 86.7%
20220 – 67.4%—
20230 – 55.1%—
Egg donation · Under 35
  • Fresh embryos
  • Frozen embryos
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
YearFresh embryosFrozen embryos
200928.1 – 78.6%56.1 – 98.5%
201019.4 – 68.1%40.2 – 87.3%
20120 – 0%0 – 0%
201417.1 – 100%1.6 – 58.4%
20150 – 46.5%—
201713.3 – 100%—
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
  • Fresh embryos
  • Frozen embryos
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
YearFresh embryosFrozen embryos
200928.2 – 54.8%42.7 – 69.4%
201035.6 – 67%56.8 – 85.2%
20120 – 0%0 – 0%
201419.9 – 64.3%0 – 31.6%
201516 – 74.9%—
20160 – 67.4%—
20170 – 55.1%0 – 100%
201817.1 – 100%—
2020—13.3 – 100%
Egg donation · Over 40
  • Fresh embryos
  • Frozen embryos
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
YearFresh embryosFrozen embryos
200942.2 – 57.8%54.3 – 69.5%
201048.6 – 66%70.6 – 85.2%
20120 – 0%0 – 0%
201444.1 – 67.7%21.9 – 54.6%
201535.6 – 67%12.1 – 42.5%
201624.6 – 59.3%12.6 – 58%
201716.5 – 50.2%26.3 – 69%
201844.1 – 94.3%25.1 – 84%
201920.5 – 93.8%45 – 100%
2020—100 – 100%
2021—1 – 99%
2022—0 – 100%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
YearUnder 40
20090 – 28.6%
20100 – 71.1%
20120 – 0%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
YearUnder 40
20094 – 71%
201021.7 – 78.3%
20120 – 0%

Year-by-year table

The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.

YearName in the registryCycles startedTransfersPregnancy per transfer (under 35)Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)Attribution
2009CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella)100-5002889.9 – 50.1%0 – 28.6%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF
2010CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella)100-50022716.9 – 68.8%0 – 71.1%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2010-Registro SEF
2011No data
2012CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella)No dataNo data0 – 0%0 – 0%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013No data
2014CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella)No data2110 – 32.6%No dataRegistro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella)No data1594.3 – 49%No dataRegistro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella)No data12224.9 – 69.8%No dataRegistro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella)No data8320.5 – 93.8%No dataRegistro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella)No data780 – 82.9%No dataRegistro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella)No data54100 – 100%No dataRegistro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella)No data361 – 99%No dataRegistro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella)No data40No dataNo dataRegistro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella)No data270 – 55.1%No dataRegistro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella)No data374 – 71%No dataRegistro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF

Gaps in the series, and how to read them

The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.

The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.

And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.

Official guide: how to interpret a centre’s data (PDF, in Spanish)

← Back to the CERAM (Centro De Reproducción Asistida De Marbella) profile

Source: “Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF” (Spanish National ART Activity Registry) — registrosef.com, retrieved 31 July 2026.