INSTITUTO DE FERTILIDAD CLÍNICA RINCÓN, year by year
Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about INSTITUTO DE FERTILIDAD CLÍNICA RINCÓN between 2009 and 2023: 11 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2014
180
2015
153
2016
150
2017
151
2018
125
2019
125
2020
135
2021
151
2022
157
2023
104
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2014
830
2015
789
2016
801
2017
804
2018
840
2019
741
2020
412
2021
471
2022
557
2023
469
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2014
44.4 – 79.7%
37.7 – 66.6%
2015
31 – 73.7%
24.5 – 63.5%
2016
28.1 – 78.6%
43.1 – 81.9%
2017
23.2 – 63.7%
28.2 – 60.7%
2018
40 – 93.3%
40.9 – 80.8%
2019
12 – 76.9%
37.6 – 71.5%
2020
28.9 – 100%
38.9 – 74.4%
2021
64.6 – 100%
24.8 – 55.2%
2022
29.6 – 90.4%
33.8 – 62%
2023
20.5 – 93.8%
38.6 – 83.6%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2014
22.2 – 53.5%
38.9 – 74.4%
2015
14.1 – 40.4%
32.4 – 71.6%
2016
12.3 – 40.3%
47.7 – 81.4%
2017
25.7 – 63.2%
30.3 – 63.8%
2018
33.2 – 76.8%
28.5 – 62.4%
2019
31 – 73.7%
21.9 – 54.6%
2020
18.1 – 56.9%
42.2 – 73.6%
2021
32.4 – 71.6%
35.2 – 67.5%
2022
36.5 – 75.5%
28.9 – 60.5%
2023
26.9 – 73.1%
16.6 – 48.1%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2014
13.6 – 46.4%
0 – 55%
2015
4.6 – 37.1%
10.6 – 60.8%
2016
9.2 – 47.9%
41.1 – 82.7%
2017
18.1 – 56.9%
6.2 – 79.5%
2018
9.9 – 44%
1 – 53.6%
2019
4.9 – 52.2%
16.9 – 68.8%
2020
26.9 – 73.1%
10.7 – 52.5%
2021
6.5 – 46.1%
5.2 – 40.2%
2022
0 – 28.7%
6 – 44%
2023
19.1 – 73.3%
23.8 – 76.2%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2014
29.3 – 67%
16 – 74.9%
2015
59.3 – 92.7%
15.4 – 84.6%
2016
29.2 – 76.7%
1 – 99%
2017
28 – 64.9%
59 – 100%
2018
16.9 – 68.8%
69.5 – 100%
2019
23.3 – 70.8%
16.9 – 68.8%
2020
0 – 49.4%
41.6 – 98.4%
2021
9.6 – 70.4%
38 – 100%
2022
44.9 – 88.4%
0 – 86.7%
2023
19 – 81%
15.4 – 84.6%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2014
49.4 – 66.1%
19.1 – 49.3%
2015
50 – 69.6%
30.5 – 61.8%
2016
46 – 67.9%
24.5 – 63.5%
2017
47.1 – 68.2%
50.7 – 80.9%
2018
50 – 71.5%
38.8 – 75.5%
2019
52.6 – 76.4%
39.2 – 72.6%
2020
42.3 – 75.4%
28 – 64.9%
2021
42.2 – 72.8%
34.9 – 68%
2022
44.3 – 71.1%
34.5 – 68.6%
2023
34.7 – 73%
44.7 – 81.2%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2014
56.4 – 65.2%
40.4 – 56.8%
2015
52.2 – 61.5%
49.4 – 63.7%
2016
55.2 – 63.7%
39.5 – 54.6%
2017
55.3 – 64%
45.7 – 61.2%
2018
52.9 – 61.5%
51.4 – 65.4%
2019
55.6 – 65.1%
41.4 – 55.2%
2020
46.1 – 60.2%
47.1 – 63.7%
2021
51.6 – 64.8%
43.6 – 58.8%
2022
53.6 – 65.3%
42.2 – 56.7%
2023
57.3 – 69.4%
48.3 – 63.9%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
0 – 37.8%
2014
5 – 31.3%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
0 – 28.7%
2016
4.3 – 49%
2017
0 – 26.1%
2018
2.5 – 64.1%
2022
0 – 46.5%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 28%
2016
0 – 26.8%
2017
0 – 26.1%
2018
0 – 31.6%
2019
0 – 31.6%
2020
100 – 100%
2023
100 – 100%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
0 – 17.4%
2014
3.7 – 32%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
6.2 – 79.5%
2016
1 – 53.6%
2017
0 – 44.8%
2018
0 – 62%
2019
0 – 41%
2020
0 – 31.6%
2021
0 – 18.1%
2022
0 – 55.1%
2023
9.5 – 57.2%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 40.2%
2016
0 – 46.5%
2017
6.7 – 60%
2018
7.9 – 64.8%
2021
0 – 62%
2022
0 – 44.8%
2023
0 – 32.6%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2009
Clinica Rincon
No data
No data
0 – 0%
0 – 37.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF
2010
No data
2011
No data
2012
No data
2013
No data
2014
Instituto de Fertilidad Clínica Rincón
100-500 · > 500
1,010
44.4 – 79.7%
5 – 31.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
INSTITUTO DE FERTILIDAD CLÍNICA RINCÓN
100-500 · > 500
942
31 – 73.7%
0 – 28.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
INSTITUTO DE FERTILIDAD CLÍNICA RINCÓN
100-500 · > 500
951
28.1 – 78.6%
4.3 – 49%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
INSTITUTO DE FERTILIDAD CLÍNICA RINCÓN
100-500 · > 500
955
23.2 – 63.7%
0 – 26.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
INSTITUTO DE FERTILIDAD CLÍNICA RINCÓN
100-500 · > 500
965
40 – 93.3%
2.5 – 64.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
INSTITUTO DE FERTILIDAD CLÍNICA RINCÓN
100-500 · > 500
866
12 – 76.9%
0 – 31.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
INSTITUTO DE FERTILIDAD CLÍNICA RINCÓN
100-500
547
28.9 – 100%
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
INSTITUTO DE FERTILIDAD CLÍNICA RINCÓN
100-500
622
64.6 – 100%
0 – 18.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
INSTITUTO DE FERTILIDAD CLÍNICA RINCÓN
100-500
714
29.6 – 90.4%
0 – 46.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
INSTITUTO DE FERTILIDAD CLÍNICA RINCÓN
100-500
573
20.5 – 93.8%
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.