Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about Estudio Médico Navarro between 2014 and 2023: 10 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2014
116
2015
110
2016
117
2017
122
2018
93
2019
93
2020
78
2021
91
2022
76
2023
41
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2014
50
2015
31
2016
17
2017
6
2018
1
2019
2
2020
2
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
38.6 – 78.1%
44.9 – 88.4%
2015
23.2 – 66.8%
25.5 – 74.5%
2016
31.2 – 83.1%
30.8 – 69.2%
2017
39.2 – 89.4%
41.1 – 82.7%
2018
0 – 46.5%
33.2 – 76.8%
2019
32.6 – 100%
29.6 – 90.4%
2020
50.5 – 99.5%
41.6 – 98.4%
2021
23.8 – 76.2%
17.8 – 64.6%
2022
100 – 100%
7.9 – 64.8%
2023
100 – 100%
12 – 76.9%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
36 – 78.3%
9.2 – 47.9%
2015
23.3 – 61.3%
30.1 – 66.5%
2016
38.8 – 75.5%
31 – 73.7%
2017
21.4 – 71.9%
39.1 – 73.4%
2018
46 – 91.5%
24.5 – 63.5%
2019
32.1 – 67.9%
21.7 – 64%
2020
13.8 – 69.6%
4.9 – 52.2%
2021
15.2 – 58.5%
33.7 – 75.4%
2022
0 – 37.8%
12.4 – 46.9%
2023
—
5.6 – 42%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
7.8 – 51.1%
0 – 40.2%
2015
—
9.6 – 70.4%
2016
16.9 – 68.8%
0 – 42.9%
2017
14.1 – 55.9%
6 – 44%
2018
21.4 – 71.9%
1 – 53.6%
2019
0 – 27.1%
0 – 41%
2020
11.6 – 49.2%
0 – 40.2%
2021
1 – 53.6%
0 – 35.4%
2022
0 – 37.8%
13.8 – 69.6%
2023
0 – 86.7%
0 – 55.1%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
100 – 100%
0 – 62%
2016
100 – 100%
—
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
100 – 100%
6.7 – 60%
2015
13.3 – 100%
21.7 – 78.3%
2016
100 – 100%
0 – 100%
2017
—
100 – 100%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
9.6 – 70.4%
13.8 – 61.2%
2015
0 – 82.9%
23.1 – 88%
2016
10 – 90%
20.5 – 93.8%
2017
—
0 – 100%
2020
0 – 100%
—
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2016
0 – 46.5%
2017
100 – 100%
2018
0 – 100%
2022
100 – 100%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2016
0 – 35.4%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2014
6.2 – 36.6%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
19 – 81%
2016
0 – 49.4%
2017
7.9 – 64.8%
2018
0 – 86.7%
2021
0 – 46.5%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 41%
2016
0 – 26.1%
2020
13.3 – 100%
2022
0 – 62%
2023
100 – 100%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2014
Estudio Médico Navarro
166
38.6 – 78.1%
6.2 – 36.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
Estudio Médico Navarro
141
23.2 – 66.8%
19 – 81%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
Estudio Médico Navarro
134
31.2 – 83.1%
0 – 46.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
Estudio Médico Navarro
128
39.2 – 89.4%
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
Estudio Médico Navarro
94
0 – 46.5%
0 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
Estudio Médico Navarro
95
32.6 – 100%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
Estudio Médico Navarro
80
50.5 – 99.5%
13.3 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
Estudio Médico Navarro
91
23.8 – 76.2%
0 – 46.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
Estudio Médico Navarro
76
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
Estudio Médico Navarro
41
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.