Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about H. Universitario De Canarias between 2009 and 2023: 15 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2009
594
2010
587
2011
542
2012
886
2013
824
2014
903
2015
853
2016
903
2017
881
2018
856
2019
864
2020
717
2021
785
2022
762
2023
724
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2009
8
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
15.8 – 23.9%
28.8 – 38.3%
2010
20 – 28.7%
31.9 – 41.7%
2011
15.2 – 23.1%
26.3 – 35.6%
2012
25.4 – 36.6%
24.3 – 33.4%
2013
28.8 – 40.9%
29.2 – 39.3%
2014
23.1 – 35.4%
18.6 – 31.2%
2015
26.4 – 39.6%
23.3 – 37.1%
2016
17.4 – 29.4%
24.4 – 37%
2017
27.5 – 43.6%
22.8 – 35.5%
2018
23.5 – 39.9%
33 – 46.2%
2019
18.7 – 34.8%
33 – 46.2%
2020
26.7 – 46.6%
26.9 – 42%
2021
18.8 – 38.7%
31.1 – 44.3%
2022
15.3 – 33.5%
31.4 – 44.6%
2023
20.3 – 40%
28.2 – 42.2%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
17.2 – 25.8%
25.5 – 35.1%
2010
15.9 – 24%
24.4 – 33.6%
2011
18.3 – 27.2%
26.3 – 36.2%
2012
23.5 – 33.3%
25.4 – 34.3%
2013
24.4 – 35.1%
26.6 – 36.1%
2014
19.1 – 29.4%
15.9 – 27.4%
2015
17.3 – 27.3%
20.3 – 34%
2016
13.4 – 23.2%
23.3 – 36.5%
2017
19.7 – 32.1%
25.5 – 36.9%
2018
17.1 – 29.2%
26.3 – 38.4%
2019
12.2 – 23%
27.6 – 40%
2020
12.1 – 24.3%
24.3 – 36.1%
2021
13 – 25.4%
20.1 – 30.9%
2022
14.9 – 28.4%
23 – 34.9%
2023
11 – 22.8%
26.7 – 38.1%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
10.3 – 35.1%
16.6 – 43.8%
2010
3.9 – 21.5%
4.8 – 23.2%
2011
12.5 – 38.6%
17.4 – 45.1%
2012
11.8 – 45.3%
14.2 – 43.4%
2013
4.9 – 38.6%
5.8 – 33.8%
2014
0 – 17.3%
7.1 – 48.5%
2015
0 – 17.9%
12.5 – 43.7%
2016
0 – 9.4%
8.7 – 30.5%
2017
6.2 – 36.6%
20.6 – 42.3%
2018
6.5 – 32.4%
16.7 – 37.6%
2019
7.2 – 30.9%
15.7 – 34.9%
2020
0 – 18.6%
7 – 25.3%
2021
9.3 – 34.6%
15.6 – 40.4%
2022
3.4 – 23.3%
17.3 – 40.4%
2023
0.9 – 22%
0 – 42.9%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
2010
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 82.9%
0 – 82.9%
2010
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 100%
0 – 100%
2010
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
9 – 27.9%
2010
7.8 – 22.3%
2011
9.6 – 25.1%
2012
8.1 – 23%
2013
6 – 19.3%
2014
4.2 – 15.1%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
5.7 – 23.3%
2016
1.7 – 18.7%
2017
2.6 – 25.2%
2018
0 – 17.4%
2019
5.6 – 28.6%
2020
6.5 – 37.9%
2021
5.7 – 34.3%
2022
9 – 41%
2023
7.7 – 42.3%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 17.3%
2017
0 – 4.8%
2018
0 – 11.7%
2019
0 – 22.2%
2020
3.3 – 30%
2021
0.8 – 20.3%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
2.3 – 35.8%
2010
12.3 – 40.3%
2011
4.5 – 28.8%
2012
23 – 50.9%
2013
5.4 – 27.9%
2014
9.2 – 28.3%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
9 – 33.8%
2016
23 – 54.8%
2017
6 – 26.7%
2018
7.7 – 29.8%
2019
4.8 – 30.5%
2020
11.6 – 38.4%
2021
20 – 52.8%
2022
6.9 – 39.3%
2023
8.1 – 34%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 35.8%
2016
3 – 41.4%
2018
0 – 12.2%
2019
0 – 25.6%
2020
4.3 – 49%
2021
11.6 – 55.1%
2022
0 – 35.8%
2023
0 – 37.8%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2009
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500
602
15.8 – 23.9%
9 – 27.9%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF
2010
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500
587
20 – 28.7%
7.8 – 22.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2010-Registro SEF
2011
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500
542
15.2 – 23.1%
9.6 – 25.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF
2012
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500
886
25.4 – 36.6%
8.1 – 23%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500
824
28.8 – 40.9%
6 – 19.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF
2014
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500 · 100-500
903
23.1 – 35.4%
4.2 – 15.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500 · 100-500
853
26.4 – 39.6%
5.7 – 23.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500 · 100-500
903
17.4 – 29.4%
1.7 – 18.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500
881
27.5 – 43.6%
2.6 – 25.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500
856
23.5 – 39.9%
0 – 17.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500
864
18.7 – 34.8%
5.6 – 28.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500 · 100-500
717
26.7 – 46.6%
6.5 – 37.9%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500
785
18.8 – 38.7%
5.7 – 34.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500
762
15.3 – 33.5%
9 – 41%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
H. Universitario De Canarias
> 500 · 100-500
724
20.3 – 40%
7.7 – 42.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.