Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about CLINICA VICTORIA REY between 2009 and 2023: 15 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2009
36
2010
66
2011
85
2012
123
2013
118
2014
128
2015
111
2016
159
2017
146
2018
85
2019
98
2020
58
2021
45
2022
54
2023
38
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2009
17
2010
17
2011
31
2012
44
2013
63
2014
46
2015
36
2016
50
2017
49
2018
30
2019
52
2020
32
2021
10
2022
7
2023
5
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
8.5 – 54%
8.5 – 54%
2010
20.7 – 54.3%
28.1 – 62.6%
2011
21.4 – 48%
32.1 – 60%
2012
21.5 – 52.2%
30.7 – 62%
2013
32 – 65.1%
32.3 – 62.8%
2014
17.2 – 54.8%
9.6 – 70.4%
2015
1.9 – 32.9%
12 – 76.9%
2016
7.7 – 42.3%
10.4 – 41.2%
2017
38.5 – 79.6%
24.6 – 66.3%
2018
17.1 – 100%
11 – 47.4%
2019
44.9 – 100%
7.1 – 48.5%
2020
0 – 67.4%
23.8 – 76.2%
2021
—
0 – 82.9%
2022
—
15.2 – 64.8%
2023
100 – 100%
45 – 100%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
14.1 – 55.9%
23.2 – 66.8%
2010
5.9 – 35.4%
14.2 – 47.9%
2011
13.7 – 41.3%
16.3 – 44.9%
2012
19.5 – 45.8%
19.4 – 42.6%
2013
23.4 – 52.8%
22.4 – 48.7%
2014
21.2 – 46.7%
4.3 – 35.7%
2015
0.9 – 22.6%
1.9 – 32.9%
2016
22.2 – 53.5%
1.6 – 30.4%
2017
17.9 – 50.8%
28.8 – 64.5%
2018
23.3 – 70.8%
5.2 – 40.2%
2019
0 – 31.6%
10 – 40%
2020
0 – 82.9%
19.2 – 59.1%
2021
17.1 – 100%
38.5 – 81.5%
2022
6.2 – 79.5%
0 – 40.2%
2023
13.3 – 100%
42.8 – 90.5%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 82.9%
0 – 82.9%
2010
0 – 27.1%
2.2 – 41.5%
2011
16.9 – 68.8%
16.9 – 68.8%
2012
0 – 37.8%
0 – 27.1%
2013
0 – 35%
0 – 29%
2014
0.5 – 49.5%
—
2015
0 – 37.8%
1.6 – 58.4%
2016
4.9 – 38.6%
0 – 32.2%
2017
1.8 – 31.6%
0 – 37.9%
2018
—
0 – 19.3%
2019
—
0 – 24.7%
2021
—
12 – 64.9%
2022
—
4.3 – 49%
2023
0 – 100%
0 – 55%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 86.7%
2010
44.9 – 100%
44.9 – 100%
2011
0 – 35.4%
0 – 35.4%
2012
45 – 100%
100 – 100%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2014
0 – 46.5%
0 – 86.7%
2017
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
2019
100 – 100%
—
2021
100 – 100%
—
2022
—
0 – 100%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 40.2%
2.1 – 74.1%
2010
12 – 76.9%
12 – 76.9%
2011
40 – 93.3%
40 – 93.3%
2012
0.5 – 49.5%
0.2 – 46%
2013
16.3 – 52.9%
33.5 – 71.2%
2014
15.4 – 84.6%
0 – 40.2%
2015
0 – 42.9%
0 – 67.4%
2016
4.3 – 49%
12 – 76.9%
2017
—
28.9 – 100%
2018
0 – 82.9%
0 – 82.9%
2019
1.6 – 58.4%
4 – 71%
2020
—
10.6 – 60.8%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 62%
0 – 62%
2010
1 – 99%
1 – 99%
2011
40 – 93.3%
40 – 93.3%
2012
9.5 – 57.2%
21.9 – 69.3%
2013
21.4 – 71.9%
29.5 – 79.9%
2014
19.1 – 73.3%
2.5 – 64.1%
2015
7.9 – 64.8%
0 – 82.9%
2016
23.8 – 76.2%
0 – 71.1%
2017
15.2 – 64.8%
16.4 – 61.4%
2018
16.9 – 68.8%
0 – 71.1%
2019
15.2 – 64.8%
17.8 – 64.6%
2020
1 – 99%
10.6 – 60.8%
2021
—
0 – 35.4%
2022
—
0 – 82.9%
2023
0 – 100%
0 – 86.7%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
0 – 41%
2010
6.7 – 60%
2011
0 – 31.6%
2012
0 – 40.2%
2013
0 – 19.3%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2016
0 – 86.7%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 55.1%
2017
0 – 86.7%
2019
0 – 82.9%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
100 – 100%
2010
1 – 99%
2011
0 – 0%
2012
13.3 – 100%
2013
10 – 90%
2014
12 – 64.9%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2016
0 – 86.7%
2022
100 – 100%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2016
0 – 55.1%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2009
CARE Clinica Ginecologica
No data
53
8.5 – 54%
0 – 41%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF
2010
CARE Clinica Ginecologica
No data
83
20.7 – 54.3%
6.7 – 60%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2010-Registro SEF
2011
CARE Clinica Ginecologica
100-500
116
21.4 – 48%
0 – 31.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF
2012
CARE Clinica Ginecologica
100-500
167
21.5 – 52.2%
0 – 40.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013
CAREMUJER Clinica Ginecologica
100-500
181
32 – 65.1%
0 – 19.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF
2014
CAREMUJER Clinica Ginecologica
100-500
174
17.2 – 54.8%
12 – 64.9%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
CAREMUJER- Quiron Sagrado Corazón
100-500
147
1.9 – 32.9%
0 – 55.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
CAREMUJER- Quiron Sagrado Corazón
100-500
209
7.7 – 42.3%
0 – 86.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
CAREMUJER- Quiron Sagrado Corazón
100-500
195
38.5 – 79.6%
0 – 86.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
CAREMUJER- Quiron Sagrado Corazón
No data
115
17.1 – 100%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
CAREMUJER
No data
150
44.9 – 100%
0 – 82.9%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
CAREMUJER
No data
90
0 – 67.4%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
CLINICA VICTORIA REY
No data
55
No data
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
CLINICA VICTORIA REY
No data
61
No data
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
CLINICA VICTORIA REY
No data
43
100 – 100%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.