Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about H. Universitario Virgen De Valme between 2009 and 2023: 15 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2018
10
2019
189
2020
237
2021
309
2022
353
2023
354
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2019
25.7 – 63.2%
35.6 – 64.4%
2020
18.5 – 61.5%
42.3 – 63.7%
2021
27 – 65.3%
50.3 – 72.4%
2022
30.9 – 63.5%
40.7 – 58.5%
2023
31 – 73.7%
44.9 – 61.5%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2018
0 – 82.9%
—
2019
24 – 50.5%
37 – 65%
2020
14.8 – 49.4%
38.5 – 60.3%
2021
21.9 – 48.9%
35.5 – 52.7%
2022
11.9 – 37%
37.6 – 55.6%
2023
14.1 – 42.3%
31 – 48.4%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2018
0 – 86.7%
—
2019
—
23.1 – 88%
2020
—
8.1 – 44%
2021
0 – 82.9%
6.2 – 36.6%
2022
0 – 24%
2.3 – 35.8%
2023
15.4 – 84.6%
16.3 – 52.9%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
12.4 – 20.5%
2010
12 – 19.9%
2011
24.3 – 36.5%
2012
11.2 – 19.3%
2013
6.9 – 14%
2014
8.6 – 15.8%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
8.7 – 21%
2016
6.6 – 16.8%
2017
3.6 – 14%
2018
3.6 – 17.4%
2019
7.1 – 19%
2020
5.7 – 19.8%
2021
10.6 – 30.6%
2022
9.3 – 32.3%
2023
4.9 – 22.7%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
4.9 – 20.1%
2016
4.5 – 18.9%
2017
4.7 – 17.8%
2018
9 – 24.4%
2019
4.1 – 34.4%
2020
0 – 18.1%
2021
0 – 25.6%
2022
0 – 44.8%
2023
0 – 9.2%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
6.7 – 26.6%
2010
5.2 – 21.3%
2011
2.7 – 39.4%
2012
10.8 – 31.1%
2013
5.9 – 30%
2014
14.1 – 35.1%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
2.1 – 21.7%
2016
10.5 – 38.1%
2017
7 – 34.2%
2018
5.9 – 35.4%
2019
11.4 – 33.9%
2020
0 – 24.3%
2021
13.7 – 39.6%
2022
15.3 – 54.2%
2023
5.9 – 35.4%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
12.4 – 46.9%
2016
6.1 – 30.7%
2017
9.6 – 33%
2018
18.8 – 55.3%
2019
10.1 – 34.4%
2020
6 – 44%
2021
9 – 33.8%
2022
5.7 – 29.3%
2023
9.6 – 31.1%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2009
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
No data
No data
No data
12.4 – 20.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF
2010
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
No data
No data
No data
12 – 19.9%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2010-Registro SEF
2011
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
No data
No data
No data
24.3 – 36.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF
2012
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
No data
No data
No data
11.2 – 19.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
No data
No data
No data
6.9 – 14%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF
2014
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
No data
No data
No data
8.6 – 15.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
No data
No data
No data
8.7 – 21%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
No data
No data
No data
6.6 – 16.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
No data
No data
No data
3.6 – 14%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
No data
10
No data
3.6 – 17.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
100-500
189
25.7 – 63.2%
7.1 – 19%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
100-500
237
18.5 – 61.5%
5.7 – 19.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
100-500
309
27 – 65.3%
10.6 – 30.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
100-500
353
30.9 – 63.5%
9.3 – 32.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
H. Universitario Virgen De Valme
100-500
354
31 – 73.7%
4.9 – 22.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.