Skip to content
ClinicasReproduccionAsistida.es

Ginemed Bilbao, year by year

Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about Ginemed Bilbao between 2009 and 2023: 15 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.

Volume first

Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.

Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
’09’10’11841’12’13’14’15’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
See this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
YearValue
2009566
2010601
2011566
2012841
2013704
2014578
2015368
2016313
2017220
2018204
2019146
2020129
202175
202248
202346
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
’09’10’11353’12’13’14’15’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
See this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
YearValue
2009256
2010190
2011164
2012353
2013318
2014290
2015186
2016180
2017133
2018107
201997
202031
202125
20229
20234

Results, year by year

Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.

IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
  • Fresh embryos
  • Frozen embryos
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
YearFresh embryosFrozen embryos
200932.9 – 45.1%42.7 – 55.2%
201026.2 – 37%41.1 – 52.7%
201118.9 – 29.5%38.3 – 50.6%
201223.2 – 38.3%30 – 43.1%
201331.3 – 49.1%33.8 – 48.8%
201428.9 – 55.7%22.2 – 38.5%
201524.6 – 66.3%33.7 – 59.4%
20167.1 – 48.5%11.8 – 31%
201710.6 – 60.8%32.4 – 57.6%
201829.6 – 90.4%21 – 44.6%
201932.6 – 100%20.9 – 47.1%
202032.6 – 100%35.9 – 66.5%
202132.6 – 100%20.3 – 55.6%
2022100 – 100%1 – 53.6%
2023—16.4 – 61.4%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
  • Fresh embryos
  • Frozen embryos
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
YearFresh embryosFrozen embryos
200915.4 – 24.6%21 – 31.1%
201015.4 – 23.9%26.4 – 36.4%
201120.5 – 29.8%31.2 – 41.5%
201220.5 – 31.9%24.8 – 35%
201325.6 – 39.8%24.6 – 36.4%
201430.7 – 48.3%19.4 – 33.1%
201526.6 – 50.8%27 – 45.4%
201622.7 – 47.5%23.1 – 41.5%
201718 – 53.5%14.9 – 33.3%
201824.6 – 66.3%15 – 32.8%
20190 – 41%14.9 – 37.7%
20205.7 – 55.9%15.8 – 39.7%
20210 – 40.2%20.3 – 55.6%
20221 – 99%40.9 – 80.8%
2023—18.5 – 61.5%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
  • Fresh embryos
  • Frozen embryos
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
YearFresh embryosFrozen embryos
20094 – 14.3%6.2 – 17.8%
20105.5 – 15.6%8.6 – 20.2%
20116.2 – 15.9%11.7 – 23.4%
20125.8 – 18.7%7.2 – 18.6%
20139.4 – 26.5%11.2 – 25.3%
201412.7 – 35.5%12.8 – 32.3%
20157.2 – 30.9%13.5 – 32%
20166.9 – 39.3%16.5 – 44%
20170 – 37.8%4.9 – 38.6%
20181 – 99%6.5 – 46.1%
20190 – 86.7%17.3 – 58.9%
2020—0 – 37.8%
2021100 – 100%0 – 55.1%
2022—0 – 46.5%
Egg donation · Under 35
  • Fresh embryos
  • Frozen embryos
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
YearFresh embryosFrozen embryos
200936.5 – 69.1%43.2 – 75.3%
201019.4 – 53.9%62.4 – 92.4%
201123.3 – 61.3%53.3 – 88.3%
201226.9 – 73.1%43.7 – 80.9%
201335.4 – 82.2%36.3 – 76.8%
201417.1 – 100%23.3 – 70.8%
2015—25.1 – 84%
2016—7.9 – 64.8%
2017—0 – 55%
2018—0 – 100%
2019—44.9 – 100%
2020—100 – 100%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
  • Fresh embryos
  • Frozen embryos
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
YearFresh embryosFrozen embryos
200927.4 – 47.3%40.5 – 61.1%
201024.4 – 45.7%24.4 – 45.7%
201143.3 – 67.1%74.1 – 92%
201235.5 – 59.8%60.4 – 79.7%
201329.7 – 57.8%27.7 – 50.4%
201410.7 – 52.5%20 – 39.5%
2015—22.7 – 49.3%
2016—22.8 – 51.7%
2017—16.3 – 52.9%
2018—12.4 – 46.9%
2019—27 – 65.3%
2020—0 – 55.1%
2023—100 – 100%
Egg donation · Over 40
  • Fresh embryos
  • Frozen embryos
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
YearFresh embryosFrozen embryos
200935.1 – 51.4%63.5 – 78.5%
201029.9 – 47.9%29.9 – 47.9%
201126.7 – 43.9%41.3 – 59.2%
201235.3 – 54.3%41.5 – 58.1%
201337.1 – 59.1%36.5 – 55.6%
20146.2 – 36.6%24.3 – 39.9%
2015—18.7 – 34.1%
2016—32.7 – 49.9%
2017—25 – 43.7%
2018—28.9 – 50.6%
2019—34.9 – 59%
2020—14.5 – 52.2%
20210 – 100%26.3 – 69%
2022—50.6 – 100%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
YearUnder 40
200918.2 – 32.1%
201018.8 – 33.4%
201113.4 – 28.8%
201220 – 38.7%
20135.8 – 21.6%
20149.8 – 27.5%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
YearUnder 35
20150.2 – 46%
20166 – 44%
20170 – 31.6%
20180 – 35.4%
20190 – 40.2%
20200 – 100%
20210 – 100%
20220 – 86.7%
20230 – 40.2%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
YearBetween 35 and 39
20154.3 – 49%
20166.5 – 46.1%
201720.5 – 93.8%
20210 – 100%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
YearUnder 40
200913.2 – 30.5%
201017.6 – 41%
201116.7 – 32.9%
201218 – 39.2%
20139.7 – 29.6%
201410.5 – 30.2%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
YearUnder 35
20152.5 – 64.1%
201621.7 – 78.3%
20170 – 82.9%
2018100 – 100%
20200 – 49.4%
20220 – 29.3%
20230 – 41%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
0255075100'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23
See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
YearBetween 35 and 39
201510.7 – 52.5%
201635.1 – 88%
20170 – 31.6%
20180 – 62%
20206.7 – 60%
20210 – 41%
20221 – 99%

Year-by-year table

The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.

YearName in the registryCycles startedTransfersPregnancy per transfer (under 35)Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)Attribution
2009Quiron Bilbao> 500 · 100-50082232.9 – 45.1%18.2 – 32.1%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF
2010Quiron Bilbao> 500 · 100-50079126.2 – 37%18.8 – 33.4%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2010-Registro SEF
2011Quiron Bilbao> 500 · 100-50073018.9 – 29.5%13.4 – 28.8%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF
2012Quiron Bilbao> 500 · 100-5001,19423.2 – 38.3%20 – 38.7%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013Quiron Bilbao> 500 · 100-5001,02231.3 – 49.1%5.8 – 21.6%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF
2014Quiron Bilbao100-50086828.9 – 55.7%9.8 – 27.5%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015Quiron Bilbao100-50055424.6 – 66.3%0.2 – 46%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016QuironSalud Bilbao100-5004937.1 – 48.5%6 – 44%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017QuironSalud Bilbao100-50035310.6 – 60.8%0 – 31.6%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018QuironSalud Bilbao100-50031129.6 – 90.4%0 – 35.4%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019QuironSalud Bilbao100-50024332.6 – 100%0 – 40.2%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020QuironSalud Bilbao100-50016032.6 – 100%0 – 100%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021QuironSalud BilbaoNo data10032.6 – 100%0 – 100%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022Ginemed BilbaoNo data57100 – 100%0 – 86.7%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023Ginemed BilbaoNo data50No data0 – 40.2%Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF

Gaps in the series, and how to read them

The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.

The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.

And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.

Official guide: how to interpret a centre’s data (PDF, in Spanish)

← Back to the Ginemed Bilbao profile

Source: “Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF” (Spanish National ART Activity Registry) — registrosef.com, retrieved 31 July 2026.