Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about Reproducción Bilbao between 2015 and 2023: 9 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2015
116
2016
187
2017
139
2018
163
2019
200
2020
49
2021
36
2022
29
2023
45
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2015
31
2016
60
2017
111
2018
112
2019
153
2020
83
2021
173
2022
119
2023
113
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2015
3.4 – 43.7%
32.1 – 67.9%
2016
4 – 71%
24.7 – 50.8%
2017
—
49.4 – 74%
2018
—
32 – 55.9%
2019
100 – 100%
33.3 – 55.9%
2020
—
28.7 – 59.1%
2021
—
19.2 – 59.1%
2022
—
30 – 70%
2023
0 – 55%
14.5 – 52.2%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2015
26.9 – 73.1%
18.5 – 61.5%
2016
1.9 – 32.9%
17.6 – 41%
2017
28.9 – 100%
21.9 – 48.9%
2018
—
38.8 – 62.7%
2019
100 – 100%
40.3 – 60.8%
2020
—
0 – 46.5%
2021
—
0 – 44.8%
2022
—
0 – 55.1%
2023
—
0 – 37.8%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2015
19.1 – 73.3%
7.1 – 48.5%
2016
0 – 30.5%
16.5 – 50.2%
2017
0 – 67.4%
2.5 – 37.5%
2018
—
22.2 – 59.3%
2019
—
14.6 – 46%
2020
—
0 – 100%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2015
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
2016
0 – 86.7%
—
2017
1 – 99%
0 – 71.1%
2018
—
1 – 99%
2019
—
0 – 71.1%
2020
—
0 – 86.7%
2021
—
0 – 62%
2022
100 – 100%
—
2023
28.9 – 100%
0 – 62%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2015
—
0 – 86.7%
2016
12 – 64.9%
38 – 100%
2017
23.1 – 88%
12.4 – 51.3%
2018
—
33.2 – 76.8%
2019
13.3 – 100%
23.5 – 59.3%
2020
100 – 100%
16.3 – 56.5%
2021
10 – 90%
27.6 – 62.7%
2022
39.2 – 89.4%
2.7 – 39.4%
2023
19 – 81%
16.3 – 56.5%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2015
0 – 35.4%
11.6 – 55.1%
2016
11.6 – 55.1%
16.4 – 61.4%
2017
17.3 – 58.9%
33 – 60.9%
2018
29.6 – 90.4%
33.1 – 55.2%
2019
1 – 99%
24.6 – 42.1%
2020
—
22.7 – 47.5%
2021
24.9 – 69.8%
32.6 – 51%
2022
48.7 – 87.6%
13.4 – 35.7%
2023
13.8 – 61.2%
25.2 – 51.7%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
0 – 31.6%
2016
0 – 37.8%
2017
100 – 100%
2018
100 – 100%
2019
0 – 86.7%
2020
2.5 – 64.1%
2023
0 – 67.4%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
100 – 100%
2016
1 – 99%
2021
0 – 20.6%
2022
0 – 100%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
0 – 42.9%
2016
13.3 – 100%
2017
0 – 100%
2018
0 – 55.1%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 67.4%
2017
0 – 24%
2018
4 – 71%
2019
0 – 26.1%
2020
0 – 42.9%
2021
0 – 37.9%
2022
0 – 100%
2023
0 – 26.1%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2015
Reproducción BIlbao
100-500
147
3.4 – 43.7%
0 – 31.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
Reproducción BIlbao
100-500
247
4 – 71%
0 – 37.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
Reproducción Bilbao
100-500
250
No data
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
Reproducción Bilbao
100-500
275
No data
100 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
Reproducción Bilbao
100-500
353
100 – 100%
0 – 86.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
Reproducción Bilbao
100-500
132
No data
2.5 – 64.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
Reproducción Bilbao
100-500
209
No data
0 – 20.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
Reproducción Bilbao
100-500
148
No data
0 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
Reproducción Bilbao
100-500
158
0 – 55%
0 – 67.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.