Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about Centro Médico GINFER SLP between 2014 and 2022: 9 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2014
40
2015
64
2016
74
2017
51
2018
49
2019
36
2020
29
2021
41
2022
19
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2014
24
2015
29
2016
46
2017
22
2018
10
2019
5
2020
34
2021
7
2022
15
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
9.6 – 70.4%
9.6 – 70.4%
2015
29.6 – 90.4%
12.6 – 58%
2016
19.4 – 68.1%
18 – 53.5%
2017
0 – 71.1%
21.5 – 67.4%
2018
0 – 55.1%
31.2 – 83.1%
2019
100 – 100%
12 – 64.9%
2021
100 – 100%
0 – 62%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
15.4 – 84.6%
0 – 62%
2015
15.2 – 58.5%
5.7 – 55.9%
2016
31.9 – 80.6%
12 – 64.9%
2017
26.7 – 80.9%
45 – 100%
2018
—
5.6 – 42%
2019
0 – 82.9%
0 – 42.9%
2020
1 – 99%
30.2 – 75.1%
2021
0 – 62%
9.9 – 50.1%
2022
—
0 – 82.9%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2017
—
13.3 – 100%
2018
100 – 100%
—
2021
0 – 86.7%
0 – 86.7%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
0 – 86.7%
17.1 – 100%
2015
0 – 86.7%
0 – 86.7%
2016
0 – 100%
6.2 – 79.5%
2018
100 – 100%
—
2021
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
2022
100 – 100%
—
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
28.9 – 100%
—
2015
10 – 90%
28.9 – 100%
2016
17.1 – 100%
21.7 – 78.3%
2017
—
0 – 67.4%
2020
17.1 – 100%
59 – 100%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2014
—
17.1 – 100%
2015
6.2 – 79.5%
0 – 67.4%
2016
35.9 – 97.5%
59 – 100%
2017
32.6 – 100%
13.8 – 69.6%
2018
100 – 100%
1 – 99%
2019
—
0 – 67.4%
2020
10 – 90%
25.1 – 84%
2021
—
0 – 67.4%
2022
0 – 82.9%
0 – 67.4%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2014
0 – 17.1%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
0 – 27.1%
2017
0 – 55.1%
2018
0 – 67.4%
2020
13.3 – 100%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 55.1%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
13.3 – 100%
2016
0 – 46.5%
2017
0 – 55.1%
2019
0 – 55.1%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2018
0 – 40.2%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2014
Centro Médico GINFER SLP
64
9.6 – 70.4%
0 – 17.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
Centro Médico GINFER SLP
93
29.6 – 90.4%
0 – 27.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
Centro Médico GINFER SLP
120
19.4 – 68.1%
0 – 46.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
Centro Médico GINFER SLP
73
0 – 71.1%
0 – 55.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
Centro Médico GINFER SLP
59
0 – 55.1%
0 – 67.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
Centro Médico GINFER SLP
41
100 – 100%
0 – 55.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
Centro Médico GINFER SLP
63
No data
13.3 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
Centro Médico GINFER SLP
48
100 – 100%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
Centro Médico GINFER SLP
34
No data
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.