Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about FIV Recoletos Ciudad Real between 2009 and 2016: 6 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2009
382
2011
419
2012
449
2014
270
2015
220
2016
223
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2009
11
2011
5
2012
15
2014
6
2015
6
2016
5
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
28.4 – 40.2%
33 – 45.2%
2011
30.3 – 41.6%
38.8 – 50.5%
2012
43.2 – 56.3%
42.3 – 54.4%
2014
44.8 – 62.5%
28 – 64.9%
2015
48.2 – 70.3%
30.3 – 63.8%
2016
40.5 – 61.9%
38.8 – 75.5%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
22.6 – 36.9%
24.8 – 39.3%
2011
18 – 30.4%
18.9 – 31.6%
2012
28.7 – 44.7%
26.1 – 40.3%
2014
27 – 47.1%
9.2 – 47.9%
2015
27.3 – 48.7%
26.9 – 73.1%
2016
23.1 – 43.6%
21.4 – 71.9%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
1.2 – 25.5%
1.2 – 25.5%
2011
6.5 – 37.9%
12.4 – 46.9%
2012
0 – 41%
0 – 30.5%
2014
0 – 62%
—
2015
9.6 – 70.4%
—
2016
7.9 – 64.8%
—
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
13.3 – 100%
13.3 – 100%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 100%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
32.6 – 100%
32.6 – 100%
2012
0 – 86.7%
0 – 86.7%
2015
100 – 100%
—
2016
13.3 – 100%
—
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 67.4%
0 – 67.4%
2011
0 – 100%
0 – 100%
2012
15.4 – 84.6%
45 – 100%
2016
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
9.6 – 21.2%
2011
6.8 – 13.5%
2012
4.2 – 12.1%
2014
9.1 – 19.8%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2015
1.7 – 18.7%
2016
6.5 – 20%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
7 – 34.2%
2016
0 – 12.1%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
10.8 – 26.3%
2011
28.1 – 71.9%
2012
3.5 – 31%
2014
3 – 41.4%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2016
9.6 – 70.4%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 28.6%
2016
16.9 – 68.8%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Cycles started
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2009
FIV Recoletos Ciudad Real
> 500
393
28.4 – 40.2%
9.6 – 21.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF
2010
No data
2011
FIV Recoletos Ciudad Real
> 500
424
30.3 – 41.6%
6.8 – 13.5%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF
2012
FIV Recoletos Ciudad Real
100-500
464
43.2 – 56.3%
4.2 – 12.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013
No data
2014
FIV Recoletos Ciudad Real
100-500
276
44.8 – 62.5%
9.1 – 19.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
FIV Recoletos Ciudad Real
100-500
226
48.2 – 70.3%
1.7 – 18.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
FIV Recoletos Ciudad Real
100-500
228
40.5 – 61.9%
6.5 – 20%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.
