In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva, year by year
Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva between 2010 and 2023: 14 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2010
20
2011
14
2012
16
2013
16
2014
30
2015
21
2016
22
2017
24
2018
27
2019
30
2020
52
2021
34
2022
32
2023
28
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2010
3
2011
6
2012
8
2013
12
2014
6
2015
20
2016
10
2017
16
2018
10
2019
27
2020
15
2021
12
2022
8
2023
20
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2010
29.6 – 90.4%
29.6 – 90.4%
2011
15.4 – 84.6%
36.6 – 100%
2012
20.5 – 93.8%
20.5 – 93.8%
2013
100 – 100%
13.3 – 100%
2014
12 – 76.9%
100 – 100%
2015
0 – 86.7%
100 – 100%
2016
100 – 100%
0 – 100%
2017
100 – 100%
—
2018
100 – 100%
17.1 – 100%
2019
—
100 – 100%
2020
0 – 82.9%
31.2 – 83.1%
2021
100 – 100%
4 – 71%
2022
100 – 100%
1 – 99%
2023
0 – 100%
38 – 100%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2010
0 – 40.2%
0 – 40.2%
2011
13.3 – 100%
13.3 – 100%
2012
59.8 – 100%
45 – 100%
2013
15.4 – 84.6%
20.2 – 85.4%
2014
0 – 62%
17.1 – 100%
2015
29 – 96%
—
2016
1 – 99%
—
2017
7.9 – 64.8%
—
2018
—
1 – 99%
2019
10 – 90%
9.6 – 70.4%
2020
29 – 96%
35.2 – 92.1%
2021
10 – 90%
20.5 – 93.8%
2022
10 – 90%
—
2023
1 – 99%
0 – 24%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2010
0 – 67.4%
0 – 67.4%
2011
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2014
0 – 67.4%
—
2015
0 – 71.1%
—
2016
0 – 49.4%
—
2017
0 – 100%
0 – 82.9%
2018
0 – 62%
—
2019
—
0 – 55.1%
2020
0 – 40.2%
0 – 62%
2021
0 – 86.7%
12 – 76.9%
2022
0 – 82.9%
19 – 81%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2010
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
2011
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
2012
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2013
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2016
0 – 100%
—
2020
—
100 – 100%
2023
—
100 – 100%
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2010
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
32.6 – 100%
32.6 – 100%
2012
17.1 – 100%
17.1 – 100%
2013
1 – 99%
1 – 99%
2014
100 – 100%
—
2015
13.3 – 100%
13.3 – 100%
2016
—
100 – 100%
2017
100 – 100%
0 – 86.7%
2018
0 – 100%
0 – 100%
2019
32.6 – 100%
0 – 67.4%
2023
—
1 – 99%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2010
0 – 100%
0 – 100%
2011
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2012
13.3 – 100%
13.3 – 100%
2013
28.9 – 100%
28.9 – 100%
2014
0 – 100%
—
2015
28.9 – 100%
4 – 71%
2016
13.3 – 100%
100 – 100%
2017
100 – 100%
19 – 81%
2018
17.1 – 100%
100 – 100%
2019
20.5 – 93.8%
25.1 – 84%
2020
100 – 100%
6.2 – 79.5%
2021
100 – 100%
23.1 – 88%
2022
—
59.8 – 100%
2023
100 – 100%
39.2 – 89.4%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2010
0 – 0%
2014
0 – 28.6%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2022
0 – 100%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 40.2%
2016
0 – 67.4%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2010
0 – 0%
2014
0 – 40.2%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2010
In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva
23
29.6 – 90.4%
0 – 0%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2010-Registro SEF
2011
In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva
20
15.4 – 84.6%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF
2012
In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva
24
20.5 – 93.8%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013
In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva
28
100 – 100%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF
2014
In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva
36
12 – 76.9%
0 – 28.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva
41
0 – 86.7%
0 – 40.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva
32
100 – 100%
0 – 67.4%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva
40
100 – 100%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva
37
100 – 100%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva
57
No data
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva
67
0 – 82.9%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
2021
In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva
46
100 – 100%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2021-Registro SEF
2022
In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva
40
100 – 100%
0 – 100%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2022-Registro SEF
2023
In Vitam Centro de Medicina Reproductiva
48
0 – 100%
No data
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2023-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.