Everything the Spanish National Activity Registry publishes about Clínica Ginecológica Bilbao between 2009 and 2020: 12 years with data. Each year carries its own attribution, because each year is a separate publication of the registry.
Volume first
Activity comes before results on purpose: a high percentage over few cycles does not mean what the same percentage over many cycles means. The registry publishes cycles as bands and that is how we show them, never reduced to a single figure; transfers are an exact count.
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytesSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — IVF/ICSI with own oocytes
Year
Value
2009
59
2010
78
2011
82
2013
79
2014
68
2015
70
2016
84
2017
80
2018
59
2019
45
2020
54
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donationSee this chart’s data
Transfers recorded per year — Egg donation
Year
Value
2009
14
2010
17
2011
21
2013
10
2014
15
2015
2
2016
5
Results, year by year
Each band is the interval the registry published that year: the floor and the ceiling of the estimate, not a point. There is no line joining the years, and that is deliberate — joining the centres of successive intervals would assert a trend the data does not support.
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
27.4 – 60.8%
27.4 – 60.8%
2010
29.6 – 64.2%
29.6 – 64.2%
2011
33 – 70.7%
33 – 70.7%
2012
37.1 – 73.3%
37.1 – 73.3%
2013
12.4 – 46.9%
11.3 – 43.9%
2014
9.2 – 47.9%
—
2015
23.1 – 88%
—
2016
16 – 74.9%
0 – 35%
2017
42.8 – 90.5%
12 – 64.9%
2018
100 – 100%
28.1 – 78.6%
2019
0 – 44.8%
6.7 – 60%
2020
0 – 62%
0 – 30.5%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
1.9 – 32.9%
1.9 – 32.9%
2010
29.2 – 62.2%
29.2 – 62.2%
2011
15 – 44.5%
15 – 44.5%
2012
28.5 – 62.4%
27.4 – 60.8%
2013
15.6 – 51.1%
14.2 – 47.9%
2014
24.5 – 63.5%
0 – 82.9%
2015
10.4 – 45.6%
—
2016
14.8 – 49.4%
6.7 – 60%
2017
5.2 – 40.2%
3.4 – 43.7%
2018
15.2 – 64.8%
0 – 35%
2019
0 – 49.4%
0 – 55.1%
2020
0 – 67.4%
21.7 – 78.3%
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
IVF/ICSI with own oocytes · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2010
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
17.3 – 58.9%
17.3 – 58.9%
2012
17.8 – 64.6%
15.2 – 58.5%
2013
0 – 22.2%
0 – 22.2%
2014
9.6 – 70.4%
0 – 100%
2015
3 – 41.4%
—
2016
0 – 37.8%
4 – 71%
2017
0 – 41%
—
2018
1 – 99%
0 – 100%
2019
—
0 – 86.7%
2020
—
0.5 – 49.5%
Egg donation · Under 35
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Under 35
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
2010
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
53.5 – 100%
53.5 – 100%
2012
13.3 – 100%
13.3 – 100%
2013
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
2014
0 – 100%
—
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Between 35 and 39
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
2.5 – 64.1%
2.5 – 64.1%
2010
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
32.6 – 100%
32.6 – 100%
2012
0 – 46.5%
0 – 46.5%
2013
0 – 67.4%
0 – 67.4%
2014
17.1 – 100%
100 – 100%
2016
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
Egg donation · Over 40
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
See this chart’s data
Egg donation · Over 40
Year
Fresh embryos
Frozen embryos
2009
0 – 55.1%
0 – 55.1%
2010
0 – 0%
0 – 0%
2011
16 – 74.9%
16 – 74.9%
2012
35.2 – 92.1%
35.2 – 92.1%
2013
0 – 82.9%
0 – 82.9%
2014
0 – 62%
—
2015
100 – 100%
—
2016
100 – 100%
100 – 100%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
9.6 – 28.1%
2010
10.6 – 35.9%
2011
12.5 – 43.7%
2012
15.6 – 51.1%
2013
7.7 – 42.3%
2014
5 – 31.3%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2016
0 – 35.8%
2017
0 – 22.2%
2018
0 – 82.9%
2020
0 – 31.6%
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AIH — artificial insemination (partner’s sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0.7 – 19.3%
2016
0 – 37.9%
2017
6.2 – 79.5%
2018
19 – 81%
2019
0 – 40.2%
2020
0 – 28.6%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 40
Year
Under 40
2009
19 – 81%
2010
0 – 31.6%
2011
4.9 – 52.2%
2012
7.9 – 64.8%
2013
17.1 – 100%
2014
9.6 – 70.4%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Under 35
Year
Under 35
2017
0 – 67.4%
2019
6.2 – 79.5%
2020
0 – 67.4%
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39See this chart’s data
AID — artificial insemination (donor sperm) · Between 35 and 39
Year
Between 35 and 39
2015
0 – 55.1%
2016
0 – 49.4%
2017
0 – 40.2%
2020
1 – 53.6%
Year-by-year table
The table is the exact and complete reading: everything in the charts, and more. Each row cites the wording the registry requires for that year.
Year
Name in the registry
Transfers
Pregnancy per transfer (under 35)
Pregnancy per cycle (insemination)
Attribution
2009
Clínica Ginecológica Bilbao
73
27.4 – 60.8%
9.6 – 28.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2009-Registro SEF
2010
Clínica Ginecológica Bilbao
95
29.6 – 64.2%
10.6 – 35.9%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2010-Registro SEF
2011
Clínica Ginecológica Bilbao
103
33 – 70.7%
12.5 – 43.7%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2011-Registro SEF
2012
Clínica Ginecológica Bilbao
No data
37.1 – 73.3%
15.6 – 51.1%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2012-Registro SEF
2013
Clínica Ginecológica Bilbao
89
12.4 – 46.9%
7.7 – 42.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2013-Registro SEF
2014
Clínica Ginecológica Bilbao
83
9.2 – 47.9%
5 – 31.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2014-Registro SEF
2015
Clínica Ginecológica Bilbao
72
23.1 – 88%
0.7 – 19.3%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2015-Registro SEF
2016
Clínica Ginecológica Bilbao
89
16 – 74.9%
0 – 35.8%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2016-Registro SEF
2017
Clínica Ginecológica Bilbao
80
42.8 – 90.5%
0 – 22.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2017-Registro SEF
2018
Clínica Ginecológica Bilbao
59
100 – 100%
0 – 82.9%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2018-Registro SEF
2019
Clínica Ginecológica Bilbao
45
0 – 44.8%
0 – 40.2%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2019-Registro SEF
2020
Clínica Ginecológica Bilbao
54
0 – 62%
0 – 31.6%
Registro Nacional de Actividad 2020-Registro SEF
Gaps in the series, and how to read them
The registry’s province-by-province census returns empty for 2009 and 2010, even though the individual profiles for those years do exist and have been recovered one by one. A centre missing from a given year means the registry publishes no profile for it that year — not that it closed.
The registry’s template changed schema in 2014 and again in 2015: up to 2013, cycles, implantation and transfers are published without separating fresh from frozen embryos, and insemination is published for a single age band (“under 40”). That is why some years carry fewer series than others: it is what the source published, not a missing figure.
And most important: a change from one year to the next is not, on its own, an improvement or a decline. The patient mix changes, selection criteria change and, at small volumes, chance changes too. Wide intervals are precisely the signal that the exact number cannot be trusted.
